The Tamil Diaspora is or rather, had been supporting the Sri Lanka terrorists for the realisation of a Tamil Homeland. Having been used to the comforts and the luxury of living in their new homes in foreign soil, they would not want to settle down in a homeland in Sri Lanka even if it were to be established.
The second and third generation Tamil diaspora would have absorbed enough of the culture of their adopted countries that the Homeland in Sri Lanka will be furthest from their minds as a permanent place of resident. What they had been looking forward with their considerable financial contribution is to establish a Homeland merely for the sense of belonging to a land of their own, without having to share it with the Sinhala.
That is not the wish of the Tamil people who have been living in Sri Lanka for generations with Sinhala, Muslim and other communities. Therefore, what ever development projects be they political, social or economic after end of terrorism should be in consultation with the Sinhala, Tamil , Muslim and other Communities who are living in Sri Lanka. The Tamils of the Diaspora has done enough damage to Sri Lanka and its people by supporting the terrorists and continuing to do so with the sole of aim of dividing the country. Therefore, they should not have any say in the future development programmes of Sri Lanka unless they give up their support for a separate homeland concept and learn to help Sri Lanka for what it is as a multi ethnic , multi cultural society.
The UN and the International Community who have pulled up their trousers and frocks to jump in to the troubled waters to support the terrorists on the pretext of saving the Tamil Civilians in the no-fire zone, are hysteric hypocrites. In their own countries they hate the coloured men, dislike even their names, in selecting candidates for employment the leave out the candidates of colour or who have foreign sounding names to select their own. They come to our countries calling themselves great humanitarians, for their own profit, where they are better off than in their own countries with their Dollars, Sterling pounds and Euros to spend their holidays or run hotels and put up bungalows.
They do not care a “damn” for the poor Tamils or Sinhala or Muslims. Their humanitarianism only gives them a chance to dictate terms to governments and make it a stepping stone to climb into more influential political lobbies in their own countries.
The UN and the International Community with their rummy human rights activists, are hoping to break up Sri Lanka , as broken up they could be unquestioned masters. Blakes, and Bouchers are trying to join up with the UN to save the terrorists leaders, so that Sri Lanka which had succeeded to end the canker of terrorism through the military solution they all advised against, want to give a life line to terrorists to bring them back , to prove that they were right in proposing a political solution as against the military solution.
They want to break up countries, while the President Barrack Obama, has different , more progressive ideas, unlike the Blakes, Bouchers and Milibands. When Russia decided to recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia as Independent States, President Obama was against it and promptly condemned Russia and asked other countries not to accord any legitimacy to its actions.
The President Obama when in Europe speaking to a gathering of Students said that he was opposed to recognising small states breaking away to seek recognition as Independent states , and said he would not interfere into the status quo of Sovereign States. Therefore the efforts of Blakes, Wilibands, Kouchners, and Bouchers to set up new states to please the “terrorists” will not receive the blessings of the President of the United States of America Mr. Barack Obama.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment