The
terrorist Front Organisations in the USA collected large sums of money
estimated at US$300 millions annually,
from the expatriate Tamils living in foreign countries. Since the
terrorists were eliminated the bulk of
the money collected for terrorism is in the hands of the Tamil Terrorist Front
Organisations in USA.
These organisations continue to collect
these funds.
It is with this money that the Tamil Terrorist
Front Organisations continue to finance their campaign against Sri Lanka with the hope
of breaking away North and East of Sri Lanka for a Tamil Eelam State either by
influencing the politicians , high officials in International organisations ,
and human rights activists of the West through financial inducement or with
their help, through another terrorist movement
using the ”sleepers” placed in
strategic areas in Sri Lanka.
It is a
group formed by these expatriate Tamil terrorist front organisations the “
Tamils for Obama” which has contributed to the President Barack Obama’s
Presidential election campaign. Such
contributions made at an earlier occasion to Ms.Hillary Clinton for her Presidential campaign is said to had been
refused and the contributions refunded.
But President Barack Obama has apparently accepted these contribution
and therefore obliged to render services in return.
Is there
any moral in accepting the “blood money”
of terrorism for President Barack Obama’s
Presidential elections campaign ?
That needs very serious consideration by the President Barack Obama and
his State Department.
The
terrorist group “Tamils for Obama” according to
a letter of felicitations to President Barack Obama on his re-election as President of USA enumerates the work they have done for his election campaign,
as follows:
- ‘During the campaign season we raised funds for your campaign through our website.
- ‘We polled opinion among Tamil Americans (95% preferred you), and distributed this result in the battleground states (all the major networks reported this poll and its result on their websites).
- ‘Our Tamil American friends, working with your campaign, worked at phone banks in the days leading up to the election.
- ‘We made and distributed two not-so-obviously-partisan videos. The links to these videos can be seen at these locations.
(http://www.tamilsforobama.com/letters/congratulations_mr_President_2012.html)
This terrorist group has not done it
because of their American Political interest , or their love for their adopted
home country America, but
because they believe that through the President Barack Obama they can “punish” Sri Lanka for
the elimination of their terrorist leaders, and
fulfil their terrorist Leader
Prabhakaran’s dream of a separate Tamil Homeland for Tamils.
US State Department is going to be the spring board of “ Tamils for Obama”, for a future round of terrorism in Sri Lanka. If that were to happen the President Barack
Obama and his State Department will be
aiders and abetters of terrorism in Sri Lanka. This is the paradox in US State Department’s never
ending diplomatic efforts passing resolutions and requesting International Control inside Sri Lanka, when the President Barack Obama and
his State Department shout from rooftops
that America
will fight terrorism where ever it exists.
The terrorist group “ Tamils for
Obama” requests the President Barack Obama, “ We hope to see an independent
Tamil homeland--Tamil Eelam--merge in northeastern Sri Lanka. We hope that you and
your next secretary of state will have an active part in helping Tamil Eelam to
be born.”
Tamils for
Obama, have not failed to include in their website, the fake video “Sri Lanka’s Killing field, with all UK Channel 4 faked photos for the President Barack
Obama’s compassionate interest for Terrorism in Sri Lanka.
However
they have not attached the video which
counters the film made by UK Channel 4: “Lies agreed upon,” which may perhaps
be of interest to the President Barack Obama , US State Department and Eileen
Donahoe the US Ambassador in Geneva to understand the extent to which the terrorists will go to punish Sri Lanka for
the elimination of terrorism in that country.
US State
Department not being satisfied by one resolution against Sri Lanka at the last
UNHRCouncil Sessions in Geneva, is
preparing a second resolution to compensate for the great support given by the
Sri Lanka Terrorist Front Organisations in America for the re election of the
President Barack Obama.
The
resolution itself is a meaningless
attempt to dishonour Sri
Lanka, and perhaps give a foot hold for the
Tamil Terrorist Front Organisations to settle scores with the Government of Sri
Lanka. It has no valid substance.
The
resolution has not been made with any
intelligent forethought. It was the
President of Sri Lanka that appointed the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation
Commission, and in the report the
Commission had included certain
suggestions as it was not the role of
the LLRC to recommend to the Government any action, as it is for the government to decide what action is called for in terms of the report
of the LLRC. Otherwise the Government
will be faced with having to take actions contrary to its election manifesto.
Hence,
it is not US State Department or the UN High Commissioner for Human rights that
is going to run Sri Lanka.
They are only trying to stop Sri Lanka’s
development process getting it embroiled in USA and International Communities attempt
to fulfil obligations to their election
partners- Sri Lanka Tamil terrorist Front Organisations to who they are highly
indebted for their respective election
victories.
They
are also demanding that the government of Sri Lanka ask UN Assistance in
implementing the recommendations of the LLRC. What could foreign specialists
do in Sri Lanka in giving effect to any
recommendations by the Commission appointed by the President of Sri Lanka. ? The US State Department is meddling in what
is not their business .
Sri Lanka had been able to
eliminate a ruthless group of terrorists without any help from USA or the
International Community which kept on harping that the only solution for the
terrorist problem is a political solution.
They were wrong in that. And how can they be correct now, in deciding how Sri Lanka should carry out its
development process.
No comments:
Post a Comment