It is a sad
day for those who love Sri Lanka, and those progressive people who watch Sri Lanka’s
evolution as a great country which has risen from ashes so to say to become the
envy of some and a beacon of hope for others.
American
State Department, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry or even President Barack Obama -they
are really of no use to us the people of Sri Lanka. They care little for the people, be they Tamil, Sinhala or Muslim, their main
interest in Sri Lanka is to what extent they
can make use of the Sri Lanka- the country in their plan of a political strategy.
The
resolution USA
got passed in the UNHRCouncil today is a display of its utter hypocrisy.
USA has really
nothing special that allows them to move
a resolution against Sri
Lanka.
USA State Department therefore turned to Navaneetham Pillay the most
controversial Commissioner of the UN Human Rights Council. Most of the US Resolution against Sri Lanka contains Navaneetham Pillay’s earlier
antagonist demands against Sri
Lanka.
There is no
secret that Navaneetham Pillay- a South African Tamil is backed by the anti-Sri
Lanka Pro terrorist Tamil Diaspora, and she wants vengeance from Sri Lanka
government for the elimination of Tamils
as much as the pro-terrorists Tamils of the Diaspora.
There is no
point asking her to come to Sri Lanka,
as any one like her coming with a
prejudiced mind against Sri
Lanka will change nothing. She had apparently sent a delegation to make an evolution of Sri Lanka’s
progress since the defeat of terrorism.
But that delegation had not been able to contribute anything constructive for Navi Pillay to change her
mind about Sri Lanka. Instead of the findings of the delegation she
had delved into the report of the Darusman Panel to include its findings in to
the resolution prepared by the US State Department.
Who had the
“big” idea of taking only the last phase of the Sri Lanka’s military operations
against the terrorists for a probe into the killing of civilians and call for accountability, leaving out the
previous 27 years of continuous massacres, assassinations, bomb blasts , and
killing by human suicide bombs of the
terrorists ?
These were all
pre-planned , USA
and its allies never expected Sri Lanka
Armed Forces to win in military operations
against the terrorists. They wanted terrorists “safe and sound” to form
a separate Eelam State.
They saw to
it by first suggesting to Sri
Lanka that the only solution against
terrorism is a political solution, then they arranged with Netherland as a mediator several rounds
of peace negotiations with the representatives of the Government, and the terrorist. The Mediators with the
support of the then Secretary of Defence Austin Fernanado raised the status of the terrorists to a Armed Force with the representatives of the terrorists
given military insignias such as Colonels, Captains and Commissars. Political Wing Leaders, Sea
Tiger Commanders etc.
The stage
was thus set for the emergence of the terrorists into an Armed Force of a
future Tamil Eelam State. Unfortunately for the Western manipulators,
the terrorist Talaivar Prabhakaran was
not ready for peace negotiations, as he wanted an unconditional formation of an Eelam State. Therefore, he deliberately broke off the peace negotiations in order to
wrench off forcibly a territory for an Eelam State.
Then the
West through Netherland as a Mediator drew up the CFA setting up terrorist
controlled areas and government areas.
The terrorists used this “ CFA Plan” to develop its military force, stock arms and ammunition
, set up factories to make bombs, submarines, protective earth mounds, set up
road blocks and train a platoon of Black Tigers specialising in suicide human
bombs.
The CFA barred
the Sri Lanka armed forces from firing at the terrorists, on the other hand the
terrorists set up claymore bombs, trained grenade lobbers, and snipers and
carried out massacres, bomb blasts, and
assassinations and took refuge in the terrorist
controlled areas into which the police or the Sri Lanka Armed Forces could not
enter in search of the miscreants.
But the
terrorists sure of their superior military power provoked the Armed Forces
which did not have even modern guns to
resists the terrorists. It was in such a
provocation that the terrorists closed the Sluice gates of Mavil Aru depriving about
60000 farmers of water and making 2000 hectares of land
uncultivable. It was then that the
Government deployed its Armed Forces to open the Sluice gates. The terrorists attacked the Armed forces
cutting their access to the gates. The
Armed Forces retaliated and that was the beginning of the determined military
operations by the Sri Lanka Armed Forces to end terrorism which finally came to
an end in May, 2009.
During the course of that
strategic military operations the West kept on harping on a political
solution, hoping the Sri Lanka Armed Forces will be defeated by the superior terrorist forces. When they saw that at last the Sri Lanka
Armed Forces had adopted appropriate military strategies, and saw that the
defeat of terrorism was imminent the
West sent emissaries to Sri Lanka.
David Miliband
and Bernard Kouchner the Foreign Ministers of UK
and France
met the President of Sri Lanka and demanded him to agree to a Cease
Fire. The President and the Armed
Forces refused to a cease fire at that
stage, and even refused an entry visa to
the Swedish foreign Minister Carl Bildt.
An extract
from a relevant report: “ Sri Lanka- The
New Great Game” in The Diplomat Blog
read, “….
As the conflict
drew to a close in the first half of 2009, there were a spate of diplomatic
incidents that reflected growing tensions between Sri Lanka and the West. Sri Lanka rejected Britain’s
appointment of Des Browne as Special Envoy to Sri Lanka and declined entry to
Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt. In addition, a joint visit in April 2009
by British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and French Foreign Minister Bernard
Kouchner to secure a ceasefire led to a further souring of relations.
Meanwhile, in April 2009, Sri
Lanka’s application for a US$1.9 billion
loan from the International Monetary Fund met with US resistance. ‘We have
raised questions about the IMF loan at this time. We think it is not an
appropriate time to consider that until there is a resolution of the conflict,’
said US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the time……”(
http://thediplomat.com/2009/
Sri Lanka stood steadfast not giving
in to any “great power” and won the war
eliminating the terrorists for good. But antagonised the USA and the
West in the attempt and its final victory over terrorism was not
felicitated to by the USA and the West.
The USA and the West have still not given up their
“plot” to annex Sri Lanka in their plan for a USA political Strategy in the Indian Ocean against China,
into which it has roped in India. USA and the West still refuse to
condemn the terrorists. They avoid being drawn into “condemn” the terrorists
and call for an accountability for the disasters it caused from those who contributed to terrorism in Sri
Lanka such as the Terrorist Front Organisations of the Tamil Diaspora, and the
Associations such as the Global Tamil Forum, Tamils for Justice and the Tamil National Alliance, so on. That is the very reason why they have
restricted their focus on the last phase of the military operations against
Terrorism by the Sri Lanka Armed forces, to avoid accusing the terrorists and call accountability from those who represent the terrorists now, on available factual
evidence against them.
This is the
back ground to the US Resolution against Sri Lanka passed at the 22nd
Session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva to-day the 21 March, 2013. In which not only India
but also Japan had stabbed Sri Lanka in
the back, despite presenting them with two elephants. !!!.
No comments:
Post a Comment