Barrack Obama knows how to use words making phrases which are beautiful and inspiring. However, his words do not match his deeds.
He had said, “ And when I am
President, we will end this war in Iraq and bring our troops home; we will
finish the job against al Qaeda in Afghanistan; we will care for our veterans;
we will restore our moral standing in the world; and we will never use 9/11 as
a way to score up votes, because it is not a tactic to win an election, it is a
challenge that should unite America and the world against the common threats of
the twenty-first century: terrorism and nuclear weapons; climate change and
poverty; genocide and disease.”
He brought back the troops from
The socialist worker.org reported: Obama's
claims about America 's
"extraordinary achievement" in Iraq are Orwellian. In reality, the
U.S. war and occupation
further wrecked an already devastated country, left it in a shambles instead of
the promised reconstruction, and stoked sectarianism between Iraq 's three
main groups--Kurds, Shia Muslims and Sunni Muslims. “
Barrack Obama got Oussama Ben Laden killed under questionable circumstances. He divided terrorists into two categories
those who attack America
and its allies as terrorists and terrorists elsewhere as freedom fighters. In Sri Lanka the terrorists that massacred
children, men and women, killed a Prime Minsiter of India and a Foreign Minister
and other Ministers and Officers and wounded an Army
Commander are only freedom fighters for Obama Administration,
who still seek to accuse Sri Lanka for war crimes for eliminating terrorism.
Barrack Obama ran his election campaign with money coming even
from terrorists from other Countries. Tamils for Obama who campaigned for
Barrack Obama are a group of Tamils in America who funded, and continue to fund terrorism in Sri Lanka .
Tamils for Obama is a terrorist group supporting the Sri
Lanka terrorists
designated as a foreign terrorist group
in USA . Now Barrack Obama is obliged to them and take
their advice to accuse Sri
Lanka for war crimes.
He captured the American voters with his speeches inspiring them with slogans “Yes We can,” and “Change and Hope”. His promise for hope and change to the American people, and peace to the world, propelled him to the White House as the 44th
President of USA on 4 November,2008 at 47 years of age.
Thereafter, he became very popular and gave the
Americans and the world lot of hope. He
continued his beautiful speeches in different Capitals in the world promising peace and equality. His idea of
peace was apparently not different from
what American Administration had always proposed. Peace through threat, peace through recognising terrorists as freedom fighters, peace through
regime change in developing countries, and peace through bombs. That is what America
always believed.
American legal system is a shame. Barrack Obama could have at least changed it
to fit into a modern democratic system. A person arrested is immediately
treated as guilty of the offence. Recently an Indian woman diplomat was
arrested in front of the school where she had come to drop her daughter, on a
question of paying a low salary to a domestic help. The diplomat was handcuffed
and taken to the police and subjected to a humiliating body check.
Barrack Obama’s first act after being sworn in as the President of USA
was to sign an Order to close down the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camps, of which he had said , “ In 2006, Senator
Obama spoke on the Senate floor in support of an amendment to restore habeas
corpus rights to individuals at Guantanamo
Bay . He argued that
holding people in Guantanamo without habeas corpus is un-American, tyrannical,
unnecessary to fight Terrorism, a potent means for stoking anti-Americanism and
fuelling Terrorism, a means of endangering captured American troops, Americans
travelling abroad and Americans generally, and a violent betrayal of core
centuries-old Western principles of justice.”
But nothing came of that promise and the Act he
signed, “ In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled that detainees at Guantanamo Bay
were due habeas corpus rights. Three months after the Supreme Court's ruling,
four Afghan citizens being detained at Bagram tried to challenge their
detentions in U.S. District Court in Washington .
After Barack Obama took office, a federal judge in Washington gave the new
administration a month to decide whether it wanted to stand by Bush's legal
argument. In a two sentence response, the Obama administration sided with the
Bush administration in declaring that those detained in Iraq and Afghanistan had no right to habeas
corpus. "Having considered the matter, the government adheres to its
previously articulated position."
Barrack Obama had to give in to what it had been under Bush Administration. That was
his “yes we can” claim. Barrack Obama could not bring the United States of America
to the surface from the depth of the American Administration mire into which it
had sunk. The Administration of USA is marked by
a blind “ greatest Nation pride” and authority coming from military power at its
command. The President Barrack Obama had
to sink into the same depth as the USA Administration to keep himself
alive. He is adopting a mere survival
tactic.
Now let us turn to President Mahinda Rajapakse the
President of Sri Lanka, a simple man of the people. He was sworn in as the
President of Sri Lanka in November,2005
at 60 years of Age.
He was worst off than Barrack Obma when he took over
the Presidency of Sri Lanka. He
inherited a Sri Lanka burdened with an on going terrorism that had continued
for over two decades. All development
work had halted. The economy was at its
lowest. People living in fear of
terrorism seemed doomed to suffer . In
addition to that the East Coast of Sri Lanka was hit by a tsunami in which more than 40 000
people lost their lives and devastated land and property.
The President
Mahinda Rajpakse knew that it is not the high sounding words as those of President Barrack Obama that
was needed to give assurance to his people. Mahind Rajapakse spoke slowly, but he spoke words rich in meaning giving
hope and confidence to the people that there is a light at the end of
the dark tunnel of suffering they were trudging through. Mahinda Rajapakse’s speeches were not empty words that flowed through his
lips, but they were meaningful , frank
and assuring words that came from the
depth of his heart.
Barrack Obama could not make such speeches. Barrack Obama though he used a flowery language and delivered his speeches in
correct diction they will remain just great speeches made in English language
and go down history as such, but what
good have those speeches done? Did those speeches Change the lives of the American
people ? Did they contribute to help the welfare of poor developing Nations ? Did
he change the American Administration from being an aggressive, manipulating system,
using threat against developing Nations who do not follow American political
views ?
Even to give the American people an affordable health
care facility he had to overcome an enormous opposition. American political hierarchy wants American
Leadership in the world , but not under a black President, hence Barrack Obama with all his stimulating speeches cannot change any thing . His slogan “yes we
can” was a bluff.
Mahinda Rajapakse the President of Sri Lanka on the
other hand contributed vastly to enhance the living condition of the people and
take a country , assaulted by terrorism, suffering from underdevelopment,
and divided by conflicting interests of Tamils and the
other Communities, towards development and progress in the right direction.
Mahinda Rajapakse when he campaigned for the
Presidential elections was aware of the
priorities he had to attend to if he
were to be the President and had a
workable pragmatic plan of development to take the country forward. When
Mahinda Rajapakse was sworn in as the
President of Sri Lanka
he promised the people that he would seek to settle the decades old terrorism
in peaceful negotiation with the terrorists, failing that he said he would
employ a military solution.
Thereafter he said he will develop the country and
reconcile the communities. Mahinda
Rajapakse true to his word having failed to get the terrorists for a negotiated
peace settlement resorted to military operations forced by the terrorists who
had forcibly closed the sluice gates of Mavil Aru water reservoir depriving access
to water to thousands of farmers.
Mahinda Rajapakse’s determination to end the nearly
three decade old terrorism resulted in complete elimination of terrorists in
May, 2009. Within four years thereafter
he organized the government and the people and developed the country rebuilding
the much neglected infrastructure- roads, communication, water supply, electric
facilities, and building schools, hospitals, banks, post offices, harbours and
airports.
Then the Tamils in the diaspora who had been supporting
the terrorism in Sri Lanka
by collecting funds, and buying arms and ammunitions for the terrorists were discouraged by the unexpected elimination of
the terrorists by the government Armed Forces. They began a publicity campaign
against the Government of Sri Lanka and its Armed Forces accusing them of
violation of human rights and war crimes.
This terrorist rump spend lavishly the funds they had collected
and continue to collect to support and reintroduce terrorism in Sri Lanka, to
buy the Western Media, American Senators, Members of Parliament in Western
Countries, Amnesty International and other human rights activists demanding
them to send an Independent International
Committee to Sri Lanka to investigate violation of human rights and war
crimes committed by the Government Armed Force in the elimination of
terrorists, and help the Tamils to set up a separate Tamil State.
These pro-terrorist Tamils in USA formed into a group calling
themselves Tamils for Obama. The USA President and his State Department depending heavily on the complaints made by
the Tamils for Obama against Sri Lanka
and its Armed Forces for violation of human rights and war crimes ,
presented resolutions against Sri Lanka at the UNHRCouncil Sessions.
Barrack Obama the President of USA faced a serious financial crisis, which he has still not been able to surmount. He has also failed to bring back all of the American troops as promised. He is therefore loosing fast the confidence of the American people, and is unable to continue to make the American people believe in an American leadership in the world.
Barrack Obama therefore turned outwards in search of a
solution to rebuild his popularity amoung the American people. He turned his attention to bring back the developing countries now turning away from
the American influence and reaching out
to China
and Russia- two countries
which are more generous than America
ever was to developing countries, and willing
to help them unconditionally to come out
of their state of underdevelopment.
Barack Obama in his effort to
reaffirm the American leadership in the world which it has lost to China and
Russia is turning towards developing countries with political strategic interest,
and other oil rich countries with economic interest , along with the Western Allies to destabilise them , and change regimes by
putting in place West friendly puppet
regimes, or bring them under their
control using the UNHRC, which seems to have become a part of the USA State
Department, and other Human Right Agencies.
In the new search for America’s place for leadership in the world,
Barrack Obama’s Administration along
with its Western Allies search for dissidents, and
terrorists in the developing countries who have taken arms against the governments in
power, and arm them as rebels (freedom fighters) to fight against the
government forces with the backing of the USA and its Western Allies. It
happened in Libya , it was
nearly happening in Iran ,
and an American led war in Syria was avoided just in time due to a
fortuitous intervention of Russia
to make America
and its allies see the reality of their folly.
Mahinda Rajapakse the President of Sri Lanka unlike
Barrack Obama the President of USA has his feet well grounded in Sri Lanka
and indefatigably search for the development of his country and bring together
the Communities . In order to satisfy
the Tamil Community he declared that there is no more minority and majority in
Sri Lanka, and made the country a tri lingual Nation. Unfortunately the Tamil community is
continuously kept apart from the rest of the Communities by a self seeking ambitious set of Tamil politicians.
The Tamil Community in Sri Lanka is suffering from a
deep inborn inferiority complex which makes them “think” that they do not
measure up to the Sinhala Majority Community, hence to assure themselves that
they are better than the Sinhala Community, they continually oppose every move
of the Government of the President Mahinda Rajapakse to reconcile the
communities to bring the Tamils into the common fold of a Sri Lankan
Nation.
The Tamils of Sri Lanka opposed to any reconciliation
with the Sinhala Community demand a province reserved only for the Tamils or a separate territory
for themselves as a Tamil State, so that
in an environment which is exclusively Tamil they will be able
to shed their inferiority complex.
The Barrack Obama’s Administration and the Western Governments who
cannot understand this “inferiority complex bias” of the Tamils, accept the
Tamil version of the discrimination of
the Tamils in Sri Lanka by a Sinhala majority
government.
Barrack Obama belonging to the American Black
Community knows very well that the Black Community in America has asserted its rights not by seeking to be a separate
community but by seeking to be integrated into the majority white community,
which the Sri Lanka Tamils if they are intelligent and not self centred should
follow.
But, that claim of discrimination by the
Sinhala majority against the Tamils is an opportunity for the USA and the
Western Countries whose parliamentarians depend on the vote bank of the
expatriate Tamils living in their countries, to implement their “ regime change
manoeuvres” on Sri Lanka- a country of
strategic value against Chinese and Russian domination of the Indian
Ocean.
That is the reason why USA
and the West are going all out to
discredit and destabilise the Government of Mahinda Rajapakse by passing
resolution at the UNHRC in Geneva
against the Government of Sri Lanka and its Armed Forces for violation of human
rights and war crimes in the last phase of the elimination of terrorism .
The President of Sri Lanka Mahinda Rajapakse, not having the ambition of
Barrack Obama for a world leadership claim, remains calm and unperturbed
following a middle path between assertion of his power of being a popular
President of a large majority of his people , and giving into unjustifiable arm
twisting of the Tamils and the USA
and its allies.
Mahinda Rajapakse’s ambition is to bring together all the communities of his country into one
great Nation of Sri Lankans. In that
commendable aspiration he seeks to establish diplomatic relations with divers
Nations, from Asia, to Africa, Middle East to Eastern Europe while trying to
maintain diplomatic relations, and cooperate as much as he can with USA and the Western
countries despite their constant aggressivity
and unfriendly moves against Sri Lanka.
Mahinda Rajapakse the President of Sri Lanka has thus built close relations
with many nations through dialogue and friendly visits. “Welcoming the first Sri Lankan head
of the state to visit Israel despite long existing diplomatic relations with
the state since 1956, President Peres commended his Sri Lankan counterpart as a
great leader for eradicating the three decades long terrorism and bringing
peace, reconciliation and restoration to the country which is not a small
achievement.”
But
Barrack Obama the President of USA does not believe in friendly dialogue. He prefers to look at the Leaders of Sovereign States of developing countries with his head raised
high taking a superior attitude, while reasserting his equality with Western
Nations.
Barrack Obama uses his country’s military capabilities, and his command over the Western Nations to threaten developing Nations and impose on them “trade embargoes and sanctions.
Jayalalitha said after meeting with Hillary Clinton, that “She recalled a
We are in 2014, it was in 2009 that the Armed Forces of Sri Lanka eliminated terrorism for good from
But while
In the meantime Barrack Obama also sends his Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs Nisha Desai Biswal who had warned that if Sri Lanka doesn't make meaningful progress in addressing the accountability issues, the patience of the international community on Sri Lanka will start to wear thin and urged Sri Lanka to take some "concrete steps" to address the issue of human rights, accountability and reconciliation process.
Barrack
Obama is not short of threats and warnings to this small Island of Sri Lanka which has a land mass of only 62,700 sq Km,
and a population of 20 million
people. But Sri Lanka under
Mahinda Rajapakse is doing far better than even USA in its economic and social development. Barack Obama the President of USA who visited
India refused a visit to Sri Lanka .
Even his
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
who visited the Indian
State of Tamil Nadu to meet the Chief
Minister Jayalalitha a decadent brainless old film star, did not have the politeness to visit Sri Lanka . That shows how much more respect and trust the President Barrack Obama and his State
Department has on the pro-terrorist Tamils expatriates in USA the pro-terrorist Tamils for Obama , than
to a popular President of Sri Lanka a Sovereign State which has a documented
history of over 3000 years.
Barrack Obama quite unconcerned about Sri
Lanka ’s hard task ahead for its development and progress has
rejected Sri Lanka ’s
plea for exemption from the oil embargo on Iran and…“ has asked the Government
to dissociate itself from some 30 companies, including banks and shipping
firms. The Sri Lankan Government’s request had been prompted by rising
costs to import refined fuel products. Petroleum Industry Minister Anura
Priyadharshana Yapa had sought some concessions for Sri
Lanka to overcome the effects of the sanctions on Iran ,
but the request had been turned down.”
So much for
Barrack Obama’s generosity to help developing countries, despite his “ change-Yes We Can”
On the other hand
Mahinda Rajapakse, the President of Sri Lanka goes on to make friends with
other nations extending his hand of friendship and generously offering as much as he can afford for the welfare and
the goodwill of the people of other Nations.
On the 7
January,2014 President of Sri Lanka Mahinda Rajapakse opened a Vocational Training Centre
funded by the Government of Sri Lanka in Betunia, in Palestine , and also donated books and
computers to the Betunia Municipal Library.
In
Palestine , the
Palestinian Foreign Affairs Minister Maliki speaking at the opening event said
. "You're contributing to the livelihoods of Palestinians and for
building a good future for them so thank you very much for that, It's
remarkable to see a president of another country dedicate so much of his energy
to another cause."
Calling
President Rajapaksa "a special, special, special guest," the
Palestinian Foreign Affairs Minister said the President's visit is
"historic in all its dimensions. It reflects a milestone in the special
relationship between Sri Lanka
and Palestine , Thank you for your solidarity,
your support and your love for Palestine ."
Mr. Mahinda Rajapakse the President of Sri Lanka recently hosted the Commonwealth Head of Government Meeting in Sri Lanka, where a very undiplomatic event took place with the head of the Government of Great Britton David Cameron who made his invitation to attend the Meeting, made it an occasion to visit the Provincial Council of the North on a fact finding mission to attack Sri Lanka for violation of human rights and war crimes at the last phase of military operations to eliminate terrorism, and visited a pro-terrorist Tamil Press office, known for its false media reports against the Government and the President of Sri Lanka.
However in his speech as the Chairman of the CHOGM Mahinda Rajapakse the President of Sri Lanka said, “….If the Commonwealth is to remain relevant to its member countries, the association must respond sensitively to the needs of its peoples and not let it turn into a punitive or judgemental body……...We must also collectively guard against bilateral agenda being introduced into the organisation, distorting Commonwealth tradition and consensus..."Our deliberations in Colombo must lead to the greatest practical benefits for the peoples of a renewed Commonwealth, one that is engaging, collective and unifying, rather than prescriptive and divisive."
Those are the differences between the friendly President Mahinda Rajapakse of not so rich and not so powerful
.
No comments:
Post a Comment