Thursday, 17 September 2015
Zaid Ra’ad Al Hussain’s UN report on Sri Lankan war crimes is like false documents Tony Blair produced for George Bush to declare war on Iraq.
Yes of
course Zaid Ra’ad Al Hussain and Pablo de Greiff may have heard of terrorism, but terrorism in
But they
cannot shut their eyes to the human side
of what it was like suffering under terrorism. For them the period of terrorism
in
Above all
for them the terrorists in
It is a
pity Zaid Ra’ad was not there then , because he would have had his share of
lobsters dinning and wining with the terrorists. It became a holiday resort for
the INGOs, the Government representatives of
How can
any one intelligent assume the report presented without giving the names of witnesses as correct ? It is a
report prepared at the behest of the Tamils who have paid people like Callum MacRae the Garbage
Collector by profession, of UKTV Channel4 to make a film of the horrors of
terrorism as those committed by the Armed
Forces. The UN Report presented at the UNHRC in
In realistic democracy
any action taken by a sovereign state against terrorism or an armed
insurgence to stop and eliminate such terrorism or insurgence should be beyond
interference into by any other sovereign state, or even an International
Organisation-the UNO, because such
actions are the inalienable right of a sovereign State in protecting its people
and territory.
In
Similarly
terrorism that began by a group of Tamil
youth was eliminated militarily with out inflicting torture. But that did not stop there as it was with
the insurgence of the Sinhala youth in the South.
Why was
it so ?
In the case of the terrorism it was an ethnic group
the Tamils who were the terrorists. When
the terrorism was eliminated it should have stopped at that, as it happened in the insurgency in the South.
But the
former became an international issue as the Tamil expatriates living in
different countries in the West who were sympathisers of the terrorists and who
contributed to arm the terrorists were able to make a hue and cry in the
countries in which they were living
using the ethnic issue as the reason for the government to eliminate terrorism militarily.
They made it out that it was not a mere elimination of
terrorism but it was a deliberate
suppression of the right of the Tamils by the Sinhala majority
government. Under normal circumstances the West and even the UN should not have
intervened as what the Government of Sri Lanka had done using the Armed Forces
was to stop terrorism, because Tamil or not terrorism had to be stopped by the government whatever its ethnic
representation , as it is the inalienable right of the Government to do so in
the interest of its people and territory.
The
Governmentof Sri Lanka could not have
stopped an insurgency by the Sinhala youth and allowed the terrorists to
continue their terrorism because they were Tamil. That seems to be the
lopsided “logic” of the West and the UN
Human Rights Council and its Commissioners.
In fact
there is no right what so ever to make the elimination of terrorism in Sri Lanka an issue of violation
of human rights , leave alone making accusation
of the Armed Forces for war crimes.
What happened in
If the
UNHRCouncil in Geneva were to justify its right to exist, and win the
confidence of member states( other than
the real perpetrators of crimes), as a Council that stands for human rights, it
should bring allegations against USA and
its NATO Partners for deliberately planned crimes against humanity.
Elimination
of terrorism in
That is the correct
interpretation the Western Governments should have made to the Tamil
expatriates in their countries who were demanding their intervention in
Instead
of that, now the UNHRCouncil Geneva
working on a resolution by
The
terrorism has been eliminated, and it is now, that any one could go around
collecting false eyewitness accounts. If
the conditions that prevailed at the time during the last phase of war
against terrorism could be imagined by even a least educated person he would give no credit at all to the
so called 3000 eyewitness accounts.
People running away from the terrorists
holding them as a human shield, had no time to look back and see what was
happening, as they were running
pell-mell with the only idea of saving their own lives.
Therefore, Mr.Zaid Ra’ad Hussain those 3000 eyewitness
accounts are not worth the paper on
which they have been written. They are false beyond doubt, and besides there is
no acceptable evidence to prove beyond doubt that those eyewitness accounts are
true.
The two
reports- Darusman Report and the UN Report on Sri Lankan war crimes, are not
acceptable for the simple reason that the names of the witnesses who gave evidence on which the reports have
been prepared are being kept
confidential for 30 years.
This is not different from President Bush stepping
over the UN Security Council to declare war against Iraq, showing a false
document prepared by Tony Blair the then
Prime Minister of UK, that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.
What
moral right Zaid Ra’ad Al Hussain has as
the UN Commissioner for Human Rights to continue to go on with the Resolution moved by USA, and present the
false UN Report on Sri Lankan war crimes, before calling USA to account for the
crimes it has committed against Iraq and Libya and continues to do in Pakistan
using unmanned Drones.
The UN
Report on Sri Lankan war crimes is an absolutely false document prepared
to satisfy the expatriate Tamil
Community in the West, USA its Western Allies; and India to divide Sri Lanka so
that China and Russian influence in the particular geographic area could be
eliminated and enable the setting up of an
American military base.
If the Prince Zaid Ra’ad Al Hussain has any proud
royal blood in him he should honourably resign from his Office as UN High
Commissioner instead of presenting a false document which has no legal value
as the defendants are not in a position to cross examine the so called 3000 eyewitnesses who had provided statements
the truth of which cannot be
established.
Further
more UNHRCouncil should extend the charges made against the LTTE in the UN
report on Sri Lankan war crimes in the absence of the terrorists, to those who
supported terrorism, for aiding and abetting terrorists in Sri Lanka, as they became
a party to terrorism by collecting funds
for the terrorists, engaging American lawyers to defend terrorism, help and encourage terrorists to carry on
terrorism in Sri Lanka.
Notice
should therefore be issued to Sampanthan and
TNA, Jayalalitha, Karunanidhi and Vaiko
of Tamil Nadu, Fr. Emmanual of the Global Tamil Forum, , Nediavan. And
the following Tamil Organisations
01. Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam a.k.a LTTE a.k.a Tamil Tigers.
The speech of the Foreign Minister of Sri Lanka
Mangala Samaraweera is a complete sell out of the Armed Forces of
The Armed
Forces of Sri Lanka did not deliberately
kill the civilians, and if some died that is collateral damages which is
unavoidable in the elimination of a greater danger. If the Sri Lanka Armed Forces had not
eliminated terrorism when it did ,
terrorism would have continued and many more civilians from all communities in Sri Lanka would have been dying daily at the hand of the terrorists,
their Suicide bombers, grenade lobbers, snipers, claymore bombs set in
busses and in trains and in market
places, and the suffering would have continue, unabated.
Is it
that what the UN, and those who now
accuse the Armed Forces of Sri Lanka for war crimes wanted ?
The
African States, Asia pacific States and the Latin American Carribbean States
present at the sessions of the UNHRCouncil in
As it had
been repeated above Sri Lanka is accused unjustly at the call of pro terrorist
Tamil expatriates for the simple reason of eliminating terrorism in Sri Lanka by a group of Tamil
and ending a thirty years of incessant suffering.
The
USAand the West who were against the Chinese and Russian support of Sri Lanka
and its very close relationship with
China which helped Sri Lanka’s very fast
infrastructure development , is making
all efforts to isolate Sri Lanka from China and Russia and bring accusations
against Sri Lanka for war crimes.
It is
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment