Mihintale where Venerable Arihath Mahinda met King Devenapetissa |
One cannot
say the same about USA as the Original Americans the Cherokee, Chippewa, Sioux, Cheyenne, Comanche, Navajos, Apaches etc were
chased away or decimated- a genocide of
the native Americans, and if one were to read the history of America one would see that
even their history has been deprived to
them. The Immigrant Europeans who came to America in 1620 and after, occupied
the land of the Indians to became the
majority . Now with a Constitution
ratified in 1788 the European Immigrants have become the people of the United States- the Americans. But
now it is the country of the Americans.
No country
go by the minorities and do not share the country with different ethnic groups
as separate communities. In France too there were groups in Corse, Basque, Normandie , Alsace
calling for independence. But they
never overstepped the boundaries
of French nationalism.
These
developed countries like USA
and the countries of Europe do not allow
political parties promoting minorities. In France there are Greeks, Italians,
Russians, Algerians but they become members of French National political parties and have no
political parties by racial and religious denominations. If Barack Obama
contested US Presidency from an Afro American Political Party he would have
never been the President of United States. In Canada the Tamils who have accepted
Canadian nationality have become members of Canadian Parliament.
The
minorities become a part of the majority so to say in a country and are
recognised as nationals of that country. Thereafter they respect the
Constitution of that country and do not seek independence as separate ethnic
groups.
Should not
that be the norm every where including Sri Lanka ?
The
Government of Australia told Muslims, “….Basically, people who don’t want to be
Australians, and they don’t want to live by Australian values and understand
them , well then they can basically clear off .”
In France before a
citizenship is granted, the applicant
has to show that he is proficient French.
Otherwise the applicant will have to learn to speak French before
applying again for citizenship. It is the same in other European countries, and
USA
as well.
Sri
Lanka is also a Sovereign State like France, Italy, Germany, United States
and others. Therefore it cannot be
different. Sri Lanka
is the country of the Sinhala. The
religion of the majority Buddhism is Constitutionally
protected. Sri Lanka has its National
flag, its National anthem sung in the language of the majority Sinhala.( though
the people who did not understand how to
reconcile the Communities allowed it to be sung in Tamil) Sri Lanka should recognise Sinhala as the national Language and allow Tamil as a provincial language.
Reconciliation
is not giving parts of the country to minorities to set up Communal provincial
areas or devolve political rights that belong to the government. At least now Sri Lanka has to stop being a
country making sacrifices to reconcile with the minorities and stand firm to
maintain its right as a sovereign State with its identifiable national rights
and symbols.
It is the
Tamils and Muslims who should recognise Sri Lanka
as the Sinhala country and accept to live with the citizens of Sri Lanka as
national entities. The Tamils and
Muslims have no right to claim provinces to be administered by themselves ,but
help build Sri Lanka as a unitary state which
is the motherland of everyone living in it.
Sri Lanka Government
should recognise as an offence punishable
for high treason, any one demanding
separation or asking special rights for
minority communities. It is not
the minority communities that have the right to decide on how security of the country and to the people should be
maintained.
Everyone
who speaks for separation of communities in Sri Lanka should be arrested and
imprisoned. No body should be allowed to make public statements promoting minority communal rights. Wigneshawaran, Sampanthan and the members of
the TNA, Anandasangaree, and Muslim politicians such as Rauf Hakeem, Rashid
Badiudin should be arrested and imprisoned if they continue their racist
demands for separation.
In recent
time the Tamils of the diaspora had begun rewriting the history of Sri Lanka . In the Wikipedia in internet there are
several diversification or interpolation
of the National history of Sri
Lanka discrediting its history and accepted historical documents
such as the Mahavamsa.
Buddhism was
introduced to Sri Lanka
by Venerable Arahath Mahhinda Thero during the rein of King Devanampiyatissa in
the third century before the current era. Then Sri Lanka was occupied by Sinhala
people from north to South and East to West.
There are no historical remains to show Hinduism had existed in Sri Lanka
before the arrival of Venerable Arahath Mahinda Thero.
There may
have been Tamil incursions for plunder and theft, but that does no give credit
to the fact that there were Tamils in Sri Lanka or Hinduism existed
before the advent of Venerable Arahat Mahinda thero.
Hinduism
had different divisions and before Hinduism there was Vedantism, and
Jainism. Therefore it is not possible
even to say which existed in Sri
Lanka and before which. However, it is possible that Hinduism in some
form or other existed in Sri
Lanka before Chritianity and Islam. There
were Indian ambassadors, and Hindu Sages in the courts of the Sinhala Kings.
Later there was a Tamil King who ruled
in Anuradhapura
from 205 to161before current era.
Christianity
came to Sri Lanka
in the first century of the present era- 72 AD.
Muslims were sea traders who often landed in Sri Lanka to buy or sell
merchandise. The Portuguese, when they started using the seas around India and Sri Lanka chased away the Muslim traders. The Muslims traders thus chased by the
Portuguese came to Sinhala Kings and asked for protection. They were settled in
the east and allowed to marry local women. That was in around 12th
century.
Recognising
provinces as Tamil or Muslim, devolution
of political power, giving police and land rights are not how real
reconciliation of communities should be done.
These are only political manoeuvres to satisfy some Tamil and Muslim
politicians. Reconciliation should be
for the welfare of the people of all communities sharing same rights and live as
brothers and sisters of the same country
–the country of the Sinhala. Reconciliation should not be just to satisfy the Tamil and Muslim
politicians.
It is very important for the people to understand what is really
meant in the statement in the preamble to the Constitution of UNESCO:
“..Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is
in the minds of men that the defences of peace must be constructed. ”
Do the
Tamil and Muslim politicians of Sri
Lanka understand the deep sense in this
simple phrase ? If they have understood its meaning they will not be calling for separation as
means of reconciliation. This phrase should open the minds closed with hatred,
desire for power, racial pride, and meaningless desire not to be second to the other. Because its larger meaning is to
be human to stretch one’s arms to clasp the other as an equal. It is to build a
nation together which would be the real reconciliation amoung human beings.
To be a human being
is above being closed up in prisons of Communality. To be a human being is
greater than being a Sinhala, Tamil or Buddhist.
The
phrase in the preamble to the constitution of UNESCO should also be a lesson to
the Western political agents like John Kelly, Hugo Swire coming from UK, and others from Netherland
, Germany and France etc, who come to
Sri Lanka to talk about reconciliation with the minorities.
Is it the
religion of the Tamils and Muslims that make them racial and hateful ?
The
Sinhala, Tamils and Muslims have lived together for generations in Sri Lanka without major social problems , why is it now that they want separation as a means of reconciliation after
having suffered under an unwanted terrorism ?
This
idea of reconciliation according to Wigneshawaran, Sampanthan and the TNA,
Anandasangaree, and the Muslim Rishad Badiudin who vandalises Sri Lanka
forest reserves to find settlements for Muslims, and Rauf Hakeem who demands a separate province for Muslims,
should look inside into their own minds to intellectually understand that meaningful reconciliation cannot come about from outside
but from inside.
Once
mentally the problem of separation as a means of reconciliation is understood as
a problem arising within oneself, it is thereafter
through friendly dialogue and the willingness to cohabit together as citizens
of one unitary State, that answers could be found for reconciliation to make Sri Lankans a happy nation living
together in peace and security.
Therefore
accept Sri Lanka
as a nation of Sinhala. The Sinhala, the
Tamils and the Muslims are all a part of that one nation. Let us salute the flag of our country
and Sing the National anthem together in
Sinhala and let us profess our religion according to our choice freely without
being a cause of harassment or a disturbance
to others.
Excerpt
from: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/australia.asp
No comments:
Post a Comment