President
Maithripala Sirisena- the tourist and collector of handshakes is schedule to
take his next flight to USA
to shake President Barack Obama’s hands.
He is soundly placed as the President of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party
which he left in the night like a thief fearing to be caught in his midnight meeting with destiny.
But
question which remains unanswered is under what provisions of the Constitution
of the SLFP Maithripala Sirisena the
General Secretary of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party for thirteen years from 2001
to 2014, who walked away from the Party
on the 21 November, 2014 to joint the UNP led opposition could be made the
President of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party ?
Maithripala
Sirisena to his shame did in 2014 exactly the opposite of what
S.W.R.D.Bandaranayake did in 1951.
On the
night of the 20 November,2014 when
Maithripala Sirisena left President
Mahinda Rajapakse the then President of the SLFP after sharing a meal of hoppers with him, Maithripala
Sirisena forfeited all his rights as a member of the SLFP. Therefore it was not Constitutionally correct
for the SLFP Central Committee to have confirmed him as the President of SLFP
after his election as the President.
Is it
therefore right that Maithripala
Sirisena who betrayed the Sri Lanka Freedom Party is nevertheless the President
of Sri Lanka Freedom Party today ?
A biased
Central Committee of the SLFP expecting benefits by way of Ministerial posts
had abused their power in confirming Maithripala Sirisena as the President of
SLFP without conducting a proper disciplinary inquiry.
S.W.R.D.Bandaranaike
left the UNP in 1951 because he recognised that the policies followed by the
UNP after the end of a long period of
colonization was not suitable for the
revival of the national identity such as the Buddhist
culture, the language, religion, even the national dress, and a mixed agricultural economy which suffered grievously under foreign rule.
Therefore,
SWRD wanted alternative political policies
to empower the five great forces of the country (pancha maha balavegaya)
the Buddhist Monks, Teachers, physicians, farmers and workers, to develop the
country bringing together the three main communities with their different cultural identities under one flag
and a language as any other Nation of the world.
He also
understood that Sri Lanka
being a developing country of the then called third world, had to have a
government related to a socialist system, rather than following the colonial rulers adopting
their capitalist system.
S.W.R.D
Bandaranaike was not wrong, because he rejected the capitalist system and
adopted a more acceptable socialist system and accepted to work with the
progressive left forces. The UNP system
did not work as it does not fit into the make up of the people, their culture
and belief systems. The rich English educated Colombians and their aristocratic
relatives, rich Muslims and vellala Tamils elsewhere though few wanted to control
the economy, and caused a social imbalance.
This
tendency changed with the coming into
politics of respectfully remembered , CWW Kannanagara a lawyer
with modest beginnings in Balapitiya as the Minister of Education in the State Council. He introduced
in 1945 the free education system which enabled young people from outside Colombo access to higher
education increasing the number of the educated people in the country.
SWRD
Bandaranaike’s SLFP greatly benefitted
from this educated class outside Colombo ,
the UNP pandering to the English
Educated failed to make a political impact on the educated rural class. Yet the Sri Lanka UNP Capitalism survived and
survives resorting to various undemocratic
means cultivating village thugs,
build dependent groups of people capable
of getting votes to UNP not necessarily
with convincing arguments but through force, fear and intimidation.
While SLFP
of SWRD Bandaranaike was to depend on a strengthened and fortified pancha maha balawegaya, UNP
suppresses, controls, and dominates the pancha maha bala vegaya.
We see how Ranil Wickramasinghe the UNP Prime
Minister uses his office to control the Sangha, treat with contempt
the Doctors (veda)on the ETCA issue, the teachers(guru) are
denied their due rights, farmers(govi) are not allowed free
fertiliser, the workers(kamkaru)
are threatened with unemployment. The Pancha Maha Balavegaya suffer, is weakened,
and looked down upon by Ranil
Wickramasinghe. Maithripala Sirisena the President is reduced to a helpless
spectator.
Hence the
Sri Lanka Freedom Party and the UNP are
two systems diametrically opposed to each other. Under such
circumstances Maithripala Sirisena the General Secretary of the Sri Lanka
Freedom Party cannot be pardoned for his betrayal of the Sri Lanka Freedom
Party by offering himself as the Common
Opposition Candidate for the Presidential election of 2015.
Sirisena
Sacrificed nearly 25 years of his political life for a handful of dollars so to
say.
Under the
circumstances the Sri Lanka Freedom Party cannot continue to exist today as
nothing has happened. The Central
Committee of the SLFP cannot be excused for having not expelled Maithripala
Sirisena. It is irregular that no
disciplinary action had been instigated against Maithripala Sirisena to expel
him from the Party. If it had been done the public is not aware of it.
The
irregularity had happened because of the personal greed of the members of the
SLFP to retain ministerial power. As it is, the Central Committee of the SLFP
Conniving with Maithripala Sirisena now the elected President of Sri Lanka, the
Sri Lanka Freedom Party fathered by
S.W.R.D.Bandaranaike betrayed by Maithripala Sirisena has ceased to exist. What
exists to day as SLFP under Maithripala Sirisena is not what SWRD wanted SLFP
to be.
Therefore, it
is ridiculous that the General Secretary of the SLFP Duminda Dissanayaka makes
a statement that he will take up with the SLFP Central Committee about disciplinary action to be taken against the SLFP
parliamentarians who attended the joint
opposition rally in support of the former President Mahinda Rajapakse.
Duminda
Dissanayake should instead look into why a proper disciplinary investigation
was not carried over Maithripala Sirisena’s leaving the SLFP to join the UNP
led opposition to present himself as the Common Opposition Presidential
Candidate. The Constitution of the SLFP
does not differentiate between a President or an ordinary member. That is democracy. If fear keeps the General Secretary and the
CC of SLFP carrying out their duties under the party Constitution , it
becomes a dictatorship under the SLFP
The SLFP CC
should not be a rubber stamp to exonerate a member who violates the
Constitution. If a disciplinary action in terms of the SLFP Constitution has
not been taken against Maithripala Sirisena it is time that such an inquiry is
instigated now, without allowing the President Sirisena to make inept
statements against other SLFP Members like Mahinda Rajapakse.
The General
Secretary of SLFP Duminda Dissanayake had said that SLFP Central Committee will
meet shortly to decide on the action to be taken against SLFP parliamentarians
who participated in Thursday’s joint opposition rally at Hyde
Park . Duminda Dissanayake
as the GS of SLFP should include in the Agenda for the CC meeting the question of disciplinary action against
Maithripala Sirisena as a member of the SLFP.
Maithripala
Sirisena’s situation vis a vis the SLFP should be satisfactorily solved in
transparency for the public to be aware of the correct procedure followed by
the CC of the SLFP in taking disciplinary action against the members of the SLFP.
When it
comes to taking action for or against party members, President Maithripala Sirisena (if he is cleared by the CC and accepted as member of SLFP) is not acting as the
President of Sri Lanka, but as the President of SLFP. These are two different roles. In this respect Maithripala Sirisena has
taken actions outside his authority both as the President of Sri Lanka and as
the President of SLFP. These should be thoroughly investigated by the CC of the
SLFP.
The actions
taken by Maithripala Sirisena just before the general election of the 17
August, 2015, both as the President of the SLFP and as the President of Sri
Lanka are strongly condemned by a large
majority of the people. As the President of Sri Lanka he should have
been neutral, as once elected President he becomes the President of every one,
and he cannot take sides to support any one or condemn another.
As the
President of the SLFP he was taking arbitrary decisions writing strong letters to an opposition
candidate criticising him and refusing to make him the President if he wins the
election. He did not respect democratic norms that should be followed. He sacked the new General Secretaries of the SLFP and UPFA and appointed new Secretaries a just a few
days before the election. He took these actions without consulting the Central
Committee of the SLFP. By these acts he showed his unsuitability to be the
President of a Sovereign
State , dictatorial,
without simple human respect to others.
A President
should not be arrogant , and disrespectful to others even if they are his
enemeies.
But
unfortunately, all actions that he is taking now such as distributing land in
the north, reducing the security forcers in the north, delaying the Local
Government Elections, promising
devolving of power to provinces are made without thoughtful
considerations of whether such actions are suitable to the country and what
effect they will have in the future.
The SLFP Central
Committee should have a disciplinary investigation against Chandrika
Kumaratunga as well. One member has no
right to criticise or condemn another member of the Party. If she has any thing
against a member of the party she should bring the matter before the CC. Chandrika Kumaratunga is no credit to Sri
Lanka Freedom Party.
A majority
of the supporters of Sri Lanka Freedom
Party today is around Mahinda Rajapakse and under his leadership, but not
around and under the leadership of Maithripala Sirisena even if the present
Central Committee of the SLFP has endorsed Maithripala Sirisena as the
President of the SLFP.
Even out
of office Mahinda Rajapakse still remains the “ President” of the ordinary Sinhala Buddhist people of Sri Lanka and
those living in foreign countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment