|
Crowds at Mahinda Rajapakse rally at Hydepark blinds Maithripala Sirisena with rage and gets his Judiciary to stop Joint Opposition May day rally. Is this Maithripala Sirisen's Yahapalanaya ? Every right thinking person should defy this and attend the May Day rally at Kirilepone and boycott May Day Rally in Galle. |
Maithripala Sirisena re-enacts his anti Mahinda Rajapakse Nadagama meticulously
prepared for the 17 Ausust, 2015 Parliamentary elections, once
again before the scheduled May Day rally. In view of this annoying Nadagama, it is well worth asking how much
of a Buddhist Maithripala Sirisena is, not forgetting that he still owes
President Mahinda Rajapakse for the Hopper he ate that night before turning
traitor to SLFP.
Is being a Buddhist compatible with turning
against his friends for personal gain ? We are not speaking of an ordinary Buddhist but about a Buddhist who takes
the reins of leadership of a Theravada Buddhist Country. However, Sirisena’s actions
vis à vis his former political mentor and companion since taking reins of leadership as President
belies his Buddhistness.
In Matugama addressing
a gathering President Maithripala Sirisena had said that the Buddhist philosophy has been
instrumental in molding a righteous
society in the country and a moral society could be built based on the Buddhist
philosophy. But it is unfortunate that
Maithripala Sirisena had not been molded either as a
righteous person nor as a moral person in the sense of Buddhist philosophy.
Maithripala Sirisena
lacks ordinary moral principles civilised men and women are expected to follow.
One such is shared secrets , and personal
information amoung friends. A psychologist says, “We use our friends as sounding
boards for the big decisions and the small decisions in our lives. We trust
them with our secrets, because we know that they won’t tell a soul.. ” .
But Maithripala Sirisena
takes a pleasure in telling unpleasant things, secrets, and confidential
information he only knows about his one time friend, Leader of the political
party in which he was the General Secretary.
Sirisena lashed at the former President at a meeting of heads of print and electronic
media. Sirisena said “ their past regime
was corrupt and oppressive and I knew
what the Rajapakse clan was planning if they won the election. Out of sheer fear and contempt and in the interest of the country , I decided
to resign and join hands with the Common
Opposition for a change despite having opposed UNP for 48 years.”
What a shameless drivel.
The people knows that he is telling blatant lies. He
never resigned from the Party , but walked away like a thief in the
night of the 13th of November, 2014 after
eating hoppers with his leader Rajapakse
whom he unashamedly- like Judas Iscariot down grades and sells to his enemies.
Sirisena was in fact roped
in by Chandrika to become the Common Opposition Presidential Candidate not
because of his aptness for the office , but because he is influenceable, according to Chandrika’s own statement. Chandrika approached him to
declare her intention as she knew that Sirisena was depressive not having been made the Prime Minister.
If it was so distasteful
being with the past corrupt Regime of
Rajapaksa, as he says , why did not he resign before instead of waiting
to be called by Chandrika Kumaratunga to be the common Presidential Candidate ?
Now he can tell lies at
round tables to open mouthed naïve listeners.
Of course the UNP Ministers and UNP sympathisers like him very much
because never would they have been able to form a UNP Government if it had
not been for Maithripala Sirisena betraying
his political party in which he had been for 48 years and leaving his friends who had trusted him
as the General Secretary of his party.
But in his unprincipled
behaviour Maithripala Sirisena shows to
what an extent he is not suitable to be the President of Sri Lanka a
predominantly Buddhist country. His motivation for this degrading behaviour, as we see it, is
that
he is suffering from an
unfathomable inferiority complex vis à
vis the former President Mahinda Rajapakse. The only way he finds to make up that
defect is by inventing and dispensing
defamatory information about his former leader.
He shows not only
his lack of moral principles, but also his ignorance of the teachings of the
Buddha being a Buddhist of no
consequence, who knows next to nothing of the deep philosophy of Buddha Dhamma.
His random tribute to Buddhism is false as he fails keeping
even the five Buddhist precepts , and having no moral principles. He gave into
temptation for power, betraying those who had placed their trust in him. He was not content with his simple situation
in life as a Minister and a General Secretary of an important political Party, and
threw his Buddhist philosophy under the
table to walk away from his friend in the night of the 13 November,2014, to
join his enemies to satisfy his unbridled greed for power.
In what ever situation a person who can stand by a
moral code, without giving into temptation
for power respecting the trust his friends had placed on him is a moral
person. In that sense Maithripala Sirisena is
not a moral person, therefore he has no right either to speak of
righteousness, nor that of morality.
A man who speaks of Buddhist philosophy may yet sin
against the moral codes of Buddhism, but what is unpardonable is not the act of treachery against those who had placed
their trust in him and go in stealth to join their enemies, but what is unpardonable is being in
the enemy camp planning revenge against
those to whom he became a traitor. This is what Maithripala Sirisena is now
doing sitting safely and comfortably with his former political enemies against
whom he fought political battles along side his former political companions.
But Maithripala Sirisena is a man boiling with anger, hatred and vengeance. An angry
man is not fit to be a President of a Nation. In Anguttara Nikaya it is, said: “
As a log from a pyre, burnt at both ends and fouled in the middle, serves neither
for firewood in the village nor for, timber in the forest, so is such a
wrathful man. ”
Srisena from his revengeful conduct against his one
time political friends shows that he is not suitable to lead the nation as its
President. A man in whatever manner he has been brought to hold the office of
the President of Sri Lanka should respect the teachings of the Buddha he had rightly or falsely followed as a
Buddhist to be worthy of being a President of this predominantly Buddhist nation. In terms
of Buddhist philosophy one should love even his enemies. Buddhist teachings
expect a very high standard of universal
love, respect and the highest degree of patience .
In Kakacupama Sutta in Majjhima Nikaya, Buddha tells
his monks: Suppose some bandits catch one of you and sever his body limb from
limb with a two-handed saw, and if he should feel angry thereby even at that
moment , he is not a follower of my teaching.
That is what it is to be a follower of the teachings
of the Buddha, and people expect their President to be an example at least to
some extent of the teachings of the Buddha.
But Maithripala Sirisena is a sad example of a very bad Buddhist. We saw during the General election of the 18
August, 2015, how Sirisena went all out to make his former leader Mahinda
Rajapakse looses at the election by sending a letter expressive of his anger
hatred, which was undoubtedly prepared with a fear of an election victory for Mahinda
Rajapakse. In that letter he warned
Mahinda Rajapakse that even if he were to win the election he will not be appointed
the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka.
Sirisena shamelessly abused his Presidential power by sacking the General Secretaries of the SLFP and the UPFA just a few days before the election appointing
his own cronies to carry out his vicious plan to oust the former President
Mahinda Rajapakse from politics.
Maithripala Sirisena invented lies to make Mahinda Rajapakse unpopular. He said that before the
Presidential election he was frightened for his life, because he
was sure that if he lost the presidential elections he and his family would
have been six feet underground in an unknown cemetery. Even after election the
fear of what Mahinda Rajapakse is capable of doing did not leave his mind.
But Mahinda Rajapakse is far from what Sirisena insinuates.
Mahinda Rajapakse respects people and he helped not only the people of Sri Lanka but he fought for the people of Palestine. People point
to Sarath Fonseka as an example of Mahinda Rajapakse’s vengeance against
people. But Sarath Fonseka’s downfall
was of his own making, and there was a reason at the time of the arrest to
believe that he had a secret agenda after the terrorist war. It is the same
with the White Van culture some speak as if it is the making of Rajapaksas. It
was not so and no one has really proved it as a fact.
Sirisena knew that despite his victory at the Presidential election, Mahinda Rajapakse
remains much more popular than him. Hence
he uses his Presidential powers primarily
to eliminate the good image of the former President Mahinda Rajapakse in the minds
of the people. Hence other matters such as countries administration and Ranil
Wickramasinghe’s mismanagement of Yahapalanaya take a secondary place in his
priorities.
Maithripala Sirisena has no vision or political
intelligence to be vigilant about matters that concern the country as a whole
and the people. He seems to be
blissfully unaware of the precipice to which his PM Ranil Wickramasinghe and
his cronies are pushing Sri
Lanka. He is not concerned with the ECTA
agreement with India, Hanuman Bridge
proposed to be constructed connecting north of Sri Lanka to Tamil Nadu. To date
Sirisena has not made a statement on
these important issues. Because his preoccupation is the fear of loosing his
popularity to the former President Mahinda Rajapakse whose rise in popularity
amoung the ordinary people of Sri
Lanka, seems unstoppable.
If Sirisena is a true Buddhist he should not restrict Buddhist morality to words to fool the
people, but should be genuine in follow
the Buddhist precepts every day at every moment to be a true Buddhist leader,
without discrimination against religion , communality or nationality. He should
also not distinguish between his friends and his enemies. He should accept
every one equally well.as his friends.
Being the President of a Buddhist country, there is a
high moral code to follow. After all a
President is different from rest of the people and one expects a very high
moral conduct from him. If not he should either submit his resignation, or change his
mental attitude .
Venerable K.Piyatissa thera says in an article “ …..
teaching of the Buddha ….includes the reflection: "Others may be harmful,
but I shall be harmless, thus should I train myself." We must not forget
that the whole spirit of Buddhism is one of pacification. In the calm and
placid atmosphere of the Buddha's teaching there is every chance, every
possibility, of removing hatred, jealousy and violence from our mind.”
There is a Buddhist verse in Dhammapada which reads :He
abused me, he beat me,he defeated me, he robbed me of my property. Whosoever harbour such thoughts will never be able to still their enmity.
Even in the Bible St Luke
verse 27 reads: “But I tell you who hear me : Love your enemies, do good
to those who hate you..”
About the May day rally, the argument put forward by
the SLFP Ministers is that the division of the SLFP will result in the
formation of a UNP Government. But despite a so
called National Government, the SLFP plays
a secondary role and it is really a UNP Government in place with the
UNP Leader Ranil Wickramasinghe as the Prime Minister implementing his
own projects that would cause irreparable damage to
Sri Lanka
and its sovereignty.
The SLFP Ministers within the Government of Ranil
Wickramasinghe are unable to stop this
dangerous march towards disaster. Therefore
a division in the SLFP with a
divided SLFP one having a May day Rally
in Galle and
the other in Kirulapone will make no difference. Ranil Wickramasinghe will
carry on with his calamitous caravan
whether SLFP “barks” united or
divided.
The ECTA agreement with India,
the Hanuman Bridge
connecting India and Sri Lanka, the
PM the leader of the UNP has promised sign
in June. The first Bond scam was not investigated . The President’s demand to
remove the Governor of the Central Bank, has fallen on deaf years. And a second
Bond scam had taken place in March this year.
But the SLFP in the Government had been helpless to
stop these scandalous affairs taking place.
So why continue with a National government when it is apparent that Sri Lanka is not
being governed well in the interest of the country and its people.
Sirisena has not the gumption to be the leader of the SLFP, because he is not
“made” for leadership. To day as the
President of Sri Lanka he plays only a secondary role to Ranil Wickramasinghe
his Prime Minister.
That may be one of the reasons why he has made running down and making false
accusations against Rajapaksas his official duty, leaving the running of the
Yahapalanaya government to the UNP Prime Minister. Ranil Wickramasinghe runs the country the way he wants subordinating it to the West and India, and finally inviting China to provide economic help and start new projects which would never come from the
West or India.
If Maithripala Sirisena is wise he would stop his
continuous vengeance against the former President Mahinda Rajapakse. He should forget the past, and try to be
independent taking a Buddhist view, developing compassion and being an
indiscriminate benefactor of the people of all religions , nationalities, without
differentiating friends and foes. That
is in fact what a President should be.
The present Yahapalanaya government is supported by
the separatist Tamils and Muslims and
some of the Sinhala Colombians, UNP sympathisers, JHU, JVP and others who had failed to get benefits from the previous Government,
and hope to be seen in a good light by
the Yahapalanaya leadership hoping that they will benefit from their support of
the President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickramasinghe.
But a larger
number of ordinary people remains with Mahinda Rajapakse and if Maithripala
Siriseana would not change the Mahinda
Rajapakse’s popularity will increase.