It is not that I agree wit his politics, but I vote gainst the extra nationalist Marine Le Pen from being elected.
Some call Macron the “ambitious man on the move” , an “ anti-System Candidate”, the “maverick centrist outsider” and yet others call him a political Prince.. If elected at 39 he would be the first youngest elected President in the history of
He calls himself a liberal – one who
stands for change or reform not abandoning entirely his Socialist hue. He prides calling
himself a child of Provincial France. He
is supported mainly by the young and the
not so young. He is no receipt holder of membership to any political party. He leads
his own political movement- En March. France
Macron former investment banker with Rothschild & Co., is a stranger to French political system having served only a short period of counselling economics to President François Holland,and then as his Minister of Economics for two years.
He is unconventional in all sense and proved his willingness to keep his promise against all odds by marrying his former High School professor 24 years his senior. He even joked about his gay tendencies, evoking the surprise of his wife Brigitte as to how he manages it despite her being with him 24 hours of the day.
At the beginning of his odd man Presidential election campaign the elder political elite did not pay any attention to him, but Macron relentlessly worked on to wriggle himself into the political lime light to give short shivers to serious Presidential candidates to be. His centrist voice finally won and he had qualified for the second run with more chances than Marine Le Pen to finally win the Presidential election.
He is not anti Muslim and does no believe in keeping closed the European boaders from immigrants. He says anyone should have the right to practice his religion with dignity. He has no sympathy to low wage earners and wishes to reduce some of their welfare benefits. He is business friendly promoting the upper class than the underdog.
I disagree on his foreign policy which does not differ from both right and left governments of the past. He is to increase defence spending , which is permissible as far as the protection of
is concerned, but not the use
of the military for intervention in foreign lands. There is no need to attack France , and the
government of its elected President Bashar Al-Assad. Syria
No government in the West has the correct politics to suit the present time. Today there is a mounting surge of violence in the world expanding to become ruthless terrorism. Hence the World Governments have to invent strategic politics not to curb terror by terror, but by finding other means to stop the surge and dissuade violence taking the form of terrorism.
None of the Western Governments are people friendly. They are more for the upper and business class. It was Francois Mitterand who was the more popular people friendly French President. More would have been pleased to vote for Jean Luc Mèlnanchon who would have been another people friendly President after François Mitterand.
Syria there was
anti government activities by certain groups which was immediately taken over by the Western
countries to promote a regime change in Syria
as they did in Libya, and as
well in 2015. The Russian Government fortunately intervened to protect the
elected Bashar Al-Assad whose government was really attacked by armed Syrian
terrorists, which interpretation was refused by the Sri Lanka and the West for whom the other
people’s terrorists are not their terrorists. USA
That Russian intervention in
stopped the escalation of war in that country and the other countries around.
It was Syria USA, under George Bush
and Barrack Obama, with his “war monger” Hillary Clinton, which was
out to intervene militarily in foreign countries, to maintain the leadership of in the world. France and the
rest of the European countries and USA joined in with their NATO
forces for this world class military assassination of Nations. Canada
The time is now ripe for all Nations of the world to start settling issues in dialogue, as UNO has failed to accomplish this role.
has also invented Human Rights as a
means to interfere in to internal affairs of Sovereign States they consider are
lead by political leaders unfriendly
and the West. USA
intervention in Ukrain was a
mistake that lit the fires of dissention amoung the European countries. It is
essential that European countries join hands with USA as a partner. instead of carrying on a cold with trade blockades. The
Governments may disagree but that is no reason why people are made to suffer by
imposing trade blockades. Political dissention between countries should be
settled by healthy dialogue. Russia
Emmanuel Macron if elected should re think about his political stand vis-à-vis
, and Bashar Al-Assad. All elected political leaders of all
Sovereign states both those of the developed countries and the developing
countries should respect each other,
that is the clef to a peaceful world where people may share each others happiness
and prosperity. Russia
Emmanuel Macron should when elected make an effort to revitalise the UN as an instrument for world peace, without allowing it to follow the rich
and the West, to isolate the poor developing nations. USA