|Making UNO a Secret Society to lynch member states|
“The purpose of UNTAI is to improve organizational performance by increasing the transparency and accuracy of information flow; enhancing operational efficiency and effectiveness; bolstering oversight and ethics systems; and strengthening financial management and governance. UNTAI is also a practical effort to establish within the UN Funds and Programs and more broadly throughout the UN system a high standard of transparency and accountability to ensure that the billions in international aid contributions are delivered efficiently and effectively to the world's neediest peoples.”
This covers all of UN activities where funds are utilised for project planning, administration and management. Hence UNHRCouncil being an organ of the UN, is also bound by the necessity of transparency of all its actions. It cannot hide behind imagined dangers to the participants of its projects or investigations. If such transparency is absent the activities are suspect, and not legally acceptable, as there is doubt as to the honesty, justice and fair play in the planned investigations, or other activities concerning a
Member State or . Member
In 2011 UN stepped outside this openness and transparency of its actions, when the UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon appointed a panel chaired by Darusman to investigate whether
Forces had committed violation of human
rights and war crimes in the course of the elimination of terrorism. Sri Lanka
The investigation by the panel shrouded in mystery hatched a damning report against
with complete absence of transparency.
The member states were not allowed to know who gave evidence, and
whether they were eye witness accounts, and evidence beyond reasonable
doubt. The witnesses were not allowed to
be cross examined and their names were not given, and even more
suspiciously their names have been
requested to be kept secret for
20 years. Sri Lanka
How could any one trust the honesty of the investigators, and the truth of the findings of the panel, when its investigation had been carried out in secrecy ? The excuse the UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon gave was that the report of the panel is not an official document of the UN but a report for Secretary General’s personal information.
In 2014 three years after that infamous report of the Darusman panel, Navi Pillai in her capacity of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights repeats exactly what Ban Ki Moon did in 2011, going a little further appointing a team of twelve for an International probe into Sri Lanka war against terrorism and to investigate war crimes the Sri Lanka Armed Forces had carried out in the course of the elimination of terrorism, refusing even to divulge the names of the members of the team of twelve appointed for the probe and on condition that the names of witnesses would not be made public for 20 years.
Navi Pillai as the UN Commissioner converted the UN Human Rights Council to a secret society like the Ku Klux Klan, the Catholic Inquisition or like the FBI calling for Secret Service Operatives to conduct investigations. It is a dangerous turning point of UN activities which are not for the welfare of the Member States but to accuse the Member States for irregularities or worse still crimes, in complete secrecy. UN as it turns out to be lacks only a hangman , scaffolding and a hangman’s noose. UN was in fact completely powerless when Sadam Husain was hanged, and Colonel Gaddafi was tortured and killed.
Navi Pillai grew as a Black Tamil without any rights as a human being under the apartheid government of
the laws enforced by the Apartheid government which completely disregarded human rights by denying non-whites a good education,
rights to vote and the right to own land.
Though she managed to wriggle through difficulties to find an education
through the collective effort of her community, many blacks remained
“primitive”. Navi Pillai had never been able to clear her mind of the terrible
suffering she went through in South Africa under an apartheid regime. South
This is one and only reason why Navi Pillai a Tamil from South Africa is determined to take revenge from the Government of Sri Lanka and its Armed Forces for eliminating the Tamil terrorists. She cannot help comparing the Government of
where the majority is Sinhala to
her apartheid white South Africa,
and the Tamils in Sri Lanka
to her Tamil Community in . She therefore adopted the Sri Lanka
Tamil terrorists as her distant family seeking freedom from the apartheid Regime
Africa . Sri Lanka
This was a reason why Navi Pillai with her biased mind should never have been appointed as the UN Commissioner of Human Rights.
The International Probe Navi Pillai has commissioned to investigate into Sri Lanka is her personal effort to do justice to the Sri Lanka Tamil terrorists- her heroic freedom fighters who were seeking emancipation from the Sri Lanka government which for her is not different from the apartheid South African regime under which she grew up. She must be taking immense pleasure in the dilemma into which the Government of Sri Lanka has been put into with the appointment of an unnamed team for a probe without the right for the Government as the accused party to cross examine the witnesses.
This is a symptom of a person suffering from a sadistic personality disorder *. It is defined as follows: “The Sadistic Personality disorder is characterized by a pattern of gratuitous cruelty, aggression, and demeaning behaviors which indicate the existence of deep-seated contempt for other people and an utter lack of empathy. Some sadists are "utilitarian": they leverage their explosive violence to establish a position of unchallenged dominance within a relationship. Unlike psychopaths, they rarely use physical force in the commission of crimes. Rather, their aggressiveness is embedded in an interpersonal context and is expressed in social settings, such as the family or the workplace.”
Isn’t UN going too far with its secretive investigations ? For all we know it could be an exercise in creative fiction writing with the end object of accusing Member States for imagined or false crimes. Can any
with the least respect it commands from its people, accept such an investigation as legal and
well founded ? Member State
How can Navi Pillai the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, expect any respect from any UN Member State if her actions are contrary to UN transparency and accountability Initiative, unless of course if such Member States are complicit to her questionable activities in the capacity of the UN Commissioner for Human Rights ?
USA who mooted this
initiative for transparency and accountability accept Navi Pillai’s high handed
International Probe into ?
Who are the members of the Navi Pillai’s probe , how much are they
paid ? Where does the money for these payments
come from ? These are relevant information that should be made available to all the Member States of the UN. They have a right to know, unless UN is
acting as a Secret Society with the consent of a few Member States. Sri
If such information is not made known the Investigation has no legal right, and should be abandoned without vilifying
an honourable of the UN, which
suffered under terrorism for thirty long
years and finally eliminated it making a
great sacrifice of life and material, to bring peace and hope to its
However, it appears from constant accusations, blame and investigations against the Government of Sri Lanka ever since it eliminated terrorism from its soil, that elimination of terrorism itself was a violation of human rights…. only as far as it concerns Sri Lanka and its Armed Forces.
Another strange coincidence was that Navi Pillai who was invited by the Government of Sri Lanka, went to the North of Sri Lanka and met the Tamil people of
probably as she thought she has a kinship to Sri Lanka Tamils, but never
showed any interest in meeting the people of the South, who also suffered from
terrorism. But as the UN High Commission
for Human Rights it was her duty to have
met both communities before she comes to conclusions. This shows her lack of objective
investigation. It also makes it obvious that what ever report she was going to
make had already been settled in her mind even before she came to Sri
Lanka Sri Lanka (she decided to come to long
after she was invited). Sri Lanka
This makes it all the more clear in her response when the Government of Sri Lanka announced that it will not allow any International Investigators to enter the country to collect evidence. Navi Pillai said , “ there is a wealth of information outside of
which can be tapped into.” Sri Lanka
She had added that "The credibility of the report will depend on it reflecting proper standards of corroboration of evidence, whether the team is allowed into the country or not.”
But for the report of the probe to be credible the investigations should be conducted openly, legally, and with transparency, which is not the case with regard to this probe of Navi Pillai, where she has refused to even name the members of the team , not allowed the witnesses to be cross examined by the “ accused party to the investigation.”
The unnamed team may not be objective investigators. They may have been selected from amoung those who agree with Navi Pillai, and persons who are anti
sympathetic towards terrorists. Sri Lanka
When Navi Pillai says that the team need not come to
as there is a wealth of
information outside, it becomes apparent what the final report is going to be.
Navi Pillai has perhaps already prepared the draft report and handed it over to
the team members before she relinquishes her services as the UN High
Commissioner for human Rights on the 31st of this month. Sri Lanka
We should therefore appeal to the delegates of the Member States who will be present at the next Session of the Human Rights Council to see without prejudice the high handed, and biased manner in which Navi Pillai the UNHRC has acted against Sri Lanka from the very beginning of her term of office. The report that will be presented to the Sessions of the UNHRC is a preconceived report for which an unnamed unknown team had been appointed at her personal behest to give credit to her report which accuses the Sri Lanka Government and its armed forces for violation of Human Rights and war crimes.
The Delegates of the Member States to the next Session of the UNHRC in Geneva, should know that the report that will be presented to them has no legal value and should therefore be rejected, as it was prepared by a team appointed by Navi Pillai abusing her power vested in her as the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights, to investigate war crimes of the Sri Lanka Armed Forces without identifying the members of her probe team by name, collecting evidence from unknown sources, without giving the Sri Lanka government the legal right to cross examine the witnesses, and on the condition that the names of the witnesses are to be kept secret for 20 years.
The appointment of an unnamed , unknown team to collect evidence from unknown sources without allowing the names of the witnesses known before 20 years is a travesty of justice.
Navi Pillai also says , “Hardly anyone, apart from the Syrian and Democratic People's
Republic of Korea governments, are questioning the credibility of
these two inquiries, so I don't see why it should be any different in the case
of .” Sri Lanka
How can Navi Pillai draw parallel to
and North Korea to justify a
probe by her unnamed team collecting evidence from unknown sources to
investigate violation of human rights and war crimes by the Armed Forces of for
the elimination of a ruthless group of terrorists ? It is beyond comparison,
she aught to be completely out of her mind to compare situations which are poles apart. Sri Lanka
Navi Pillay has also said that, “ it was important to understand that the investigation was set up for the benefit of all Sri Lankans, as an avenue to achieve lasting peace and reconciliation. It is in this context that the Human Rights Council-mandated investigation should be viewed, rather than being seen as a confrontation.”
Sri Lanka has finished with terrorism and is looking forward to unite the Communities and benefit from the long awaited peace and go forward to develop the country to make the people live in content and happiness. But Navi Pillai with her biased mind cannot understand that these International Probes will be an obstacle for the reconciliation of Communities, opening old wounds to separate communities further away rather than unite them.
Navi Pillai has however named three advicers to her “unnamed” team as experts: Nobel Laureate Martti Ahtisaari, international judge Dame Silvia Cartwright of New Zealand, and Ms Asma Jahangir, former President of Pakistan's Supreme Court Bar Association with senior human rights official Ms. Sandra Beidas to coordinate the team.
The unnamed team members, as well as the above named experts may be financially well compensated from funds collected from unnamed donors. It will not be surprising if the pro –terrorist Tamil diaspora has also contributed a large sum from their reserves of blood money collected to assist the terrorism in
|She was kicked out of Sudan|
But unfortunately these experts and coordinator Sandra Beidas selected by Navi Pillai have their own skeletons in their cupboards.