Jayampathy Wickramaratne the man
who prepared the Interim Report placed before the Parliament for a debate says
in defence of writing a new Constitution
that the President Mahinda Rajapakse had stated in his election manifesto the
necessity for a new Constitution and
that what they have now done is nothing different from what Mahinda
Rajapakse would have done if he would have
still been the President.
Is that an argument to defend the stupid document they have presented to the Parliament ?
But Wickramaratne should know that Mahinda Rajapakse would not have allowed
to desecrate the cultural revival brought about by SWRD Bandaranayake.
Mahinda Rajapakse would not have
allowed the country to be divided and
Buddhist Religion and Cultural values regained after over 500 years of neglect, abuse and desecration by the Colonial rulers, to be removed from State
protection, and give equal Status with other Cultures and Religions which were
introduced later to the country, through a New Constitution.
A Constitution does not become valid because it had been written after a long
consultation with the people. It has to be written by learned persons, putting
into it important matters taking into account the uniqueness of the country and
the people and their religious and cultural values that had shaped the country
and its people over a long period of time.
In writing a New Constitution there should not be no model or jumping
from what the country and the people had
been, to a modern age where the past values are relegated to history and bring
in new values that are strange to the
Country and the people.
Jayampathy Wickramaratne from his presentation of his ideas in a Hiru TV
debate showed that he is not a suitable person to write a Constitution to a
country like Sri Lanka .
In that debate in the TV he told one of his opponents that he should keep his
arguments for himself and listen to what he has to say as he is an intellectual.
A Constitution is not written to reconcile with Communities .
Reconciliation is a different activity and the Constitution should not be an
instrument to create dissention amoung people through pseudo reconciliation
with Tamils who do not want reconciliation but division and separation..
It was a mistake to have consulted the people in order to write a New Constitution to Sri Lanka .
The 1978 Constitution is not an ideal Constitution but it had been
useful during the most crucial period of the History of Sri Lanka . The
Executive Powers of the President of Sri
Lanka was an important “implement” in fighting a ruthless terrorism that
created havoc and untold misery to the people, even if the Tamils today seem to
have forgotten that period of terror and hopelessness.
But still the time is too close to a terrorism that has been eliminated
not long ago and the people are not ready for any changes from what they had
been used to. Therefore Sri
Lanka should continue with the 1978
Constitution until country has found complete peace and security.
The Yahapalanaya Government came to power too soon after the elimination
of terrorism and the embers of terrorism and dissention is still remaining warm
under the heap of ash that had been left behind.
The foreign Governments are helping
to keep the embers of terrorism alive and it is time the Government instead of writing a new
Constitution advice the Western Governments the necessity for Sri Lanka
to remain un-interfered by the west, that does not and will not understand the
minds of the Sri Lankan people be they Sinhala, Tamil or Muslim.
The ordinary Tamil people just released from thirty years of suffering
are not allowed by their political messiahs to take a rest and taste peace and
security for a while to see clearly what their future should be, and how it is
to be shaped and by whom.
The present haste of the Yahapalanaya to change every thing overnight is
improper, harmful and dangerous to the people as a whole. Doing things in haste
we are bound to neglect the essentials.
Even the Speaker Karu Jayasuriya speaks of this unnecessary haste of the Government which he himself does
not understand, but to which he gives in
despite the trust the people places on a
Speaker of the Parliament to do the correct thing.
Karu Jayasuriya the Speaker had said, “ …… From the beginning I said, we cannot
have legislations passed in the future in such a hush, hush manner. We have
Oversight Committees. We have transparency. Sri Lanka Parliament is looked upon
as a model. So, it has to follow all the good practices. I have spoken to the
Prime Minister and the Leader of the House, and all concerned. I am quite
hopeful that, in the future, there won’t be a repetition of this nature. It is,
of course, embarrassing to the Speaker and the Secretariat.”
The Speaker of the Parliament has to be more
alert and democratic as he has already
lost the confidence of the people for his lack of independence and his
seemingly serving more the interest of theYahapalanaya and UNP to which he belongs.
It is undemocratic not to have recognised a 51
member Joint opposition as the Parliamentary Opposition instead of the TNA with
only 17 parliamentarians.
The Prime Minister Ranil Wickramasinghe behaves like a clown in Parliament and says
most stupid things such as that the Parliamentrians who have not come to
Parliament nevertheless comes to eat in the Canteen of the Constitutional
Assembly.
His UNP followers are no better any serious discussion
is made a situation of fun and laughter.
Yesterday at the Derana TV VadaPitiya the UNP
Members Kavinda Jayawardhana and Wijepala Hettiarachchi had no valid arguments
to defend the Interim Report on the New Constitution other than to read a report
by the former President Mahinda Rajapakse about the necessity for a new
Constitution saying that it is the same
thing that they have presented to the Parliament. They heckled and disturbed
the opposition members Kalum Amunugam
and Wimalaweera Dissanayake without allowing them to present their views
against the Interim Report.
The best thing the President Maithripala
Sirisena can do is to demand the withdrawal of the interim report and stop
further attempts at writing a new Constitution to Sri Lanka . If the Tamil Politicians
and the Western enemies of Sri
Lanka
raise objections, they should be asked to stay a little longer and find
other ways of bringing the Communities together without dividing the country or
writing new Constitutions.
We want Sri Lanka as it is, not as an Orumitta Nadu.
No comments:
Post a Comment