In Guantanamo Torture Camp of USA a prisnor being taken to be questioned !!! |
Tuesday, 27 February 2018
Zeid Ra’ad Al-Hussein Wake up it is your Role as UNC HR, that no Member State presents a resolution based on false information against another Member State.
He is a Prince by his
hereditary right, but his thinking and understanding it seems are far from that of a Prince. A real Prince becomes so by his
action and ability to see through things to sift facts from fiction to understand
the truth to help the mankind, and not by been born a Prince.
He is the man who replaced the South African
Tamil woman Navi Pillai as the UN High Commissioner for human rights. Navi
Pillai was the person who was intent in accusing the
Yasmin Sooka who was
one of the members of the UN SG’s Panel of experts appointed appointed by Ban Ki Moon the UNSG,
to prepare the so called Darusman report
on the Sri Lanka Government’s
accountability on the elimination of terrorism
in Sri Lanka, another victim of South African Apartheid, is a Human
Rights lawyer.
Yasmin Sooka, being with Navipillai on the opposite side of
the fence against the Government of Sri Lanka, still carries out her compatriot Navi Pillai’s agenda against
Sri Lanka Armed Forces. Education has given them no philosophical
sensibility,hence they have no sense of
unbiased justice and righteousness .
They are carried away by their personal prejudices. Sooka blinded by her prejudiced
mind carries out what Navi Pillai began by piling accusations against the Sri
Lanka Armed Forces.
Her recent effort to
bring a lawsuit against General Jagath Jayasuriya while he was Ambassador in
But this Prince -
Zeid Ra’ad Al-Hussein seems merely
carrying out the duties of the UN High Commissioner from where Navi Pillai left
it for him, without taking time to think over it himself to come to a different
understanding of a developing country faced with terrorism by the youth from
the Tamil Community of Sri Lanka itself, taken over by a neighbouring state to
train them as terrorists.
That is what he
should have first done if he had a Princely mind without acting as a mere bureaucrat
without thoroughly investigating to understand the rights and
wrongs of the accusations, before
he himself likea puppet on a string points his own fingers of
accusation at
Zeid Ra’ad Al-Hussein the UNHCHR
should have examined the
Therefore, the passing of the resolution against the Armed Forces
of Sri Lanka for War crimes by
On the other hand,
unlike Sri Lanka Government and Armed Forces which knew where the terrorists
were located, it is the USA and its Allies with the NATO forces that carry out
unceasing bombardments against terrorists in Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq without
even identifying the areas where the terrorists are located, thus killing large
numbers of innocent civilians which the USA and its Allies put as “ collateral damage”.
The Prince- Zeid Al-Hussein should look
into this contradiction in the
Resolution presented by the
Yasmin Sooka like a “ sorceress flinging out her skirts in
a macabre dance” accuses the Sri Lanka Government and its Armed Forces without
having a shred of real evidence, and not
even knowing what happened in
The Darusman report she hoists in
support of her claim of war crimes by the Armed Forces of Sri Lanka was written by a three member Panel in which
she was a member. The Prince Zeid
Al-Hussein should have investigated how it was prepared before accepting
that report which in reality is no more than a fiction writing. In fact
this Darusman Report has no official validity as Ban Ki Moon the then UNSG himself said that
it was a report prepared for his personal information.
Darusman Report was prepared by the
Panelists sitting in separate rooms in the UN Head Quarters, without having visited
The Darusman report is a fictitious crime story
prepared sitting comfortably in an office rooms in the UN Head Quarters with
Secretaries and Computers using only e-mails, internet and perhaps telephone
calls. It was later supported by a documentary prepared with falsified images by
a private TV Channel in
What does the Prince know of the background to the
Darusman report ? Does he investigate to find out whether it is really reliable
document ?
The Darusman Panel collected information using the Internet taking evidence through
e-mails from various pro terrorist Organisations and their members of the Tamil
Diaspora, who had also not visited Sri Lanka during the terrorism, some of them
having fled the country when terrorism commenced in Sri Lanka, and others of
the second generation Tamil diaspora, only
hearing fancy stories related by their parents from what they
thought they remembered.
No one accused in the report as
having committed war crimes, can challenge and cross examine the witnesses to
check on the evidence they had given, as their names are not given in the
report and the Panel has ruled that the
names of the persons who gave evidence should not be divulged before twenty
years.
The fact is that there were no witnesses who came
before the Panel to give evidence ,
…..Can you cross examine
“e-mails” ?
The UNSG Ban Ki Moon was wrong to
have released that document to the UN Commissioner of Human rights as it is not
a legal document. The Darusman Report could be challenged in any court of law
as a document which could be legally accepted, as the report has been
written on evidence supposed to have been given by unknown persons and the evidence cannot be
verified to be correct.
Even the wise Prince Zeid Al-Husseing had been duped ?
Sometime it is not education in best of schools and
experience working in clover that makes one intelligent, one should also have
common sense of an ordinary man, who
thinks like an ordinary human being to understand the cultures , way of
thinking, of the people of other countries, who have different religious
beliefs and think and act differently from a Prince who was born to princely
pleasure and a life of luxury.
The Prince Zeid a graduate of the John Hopkins University and received a Ph.D from the University of
Cambridge should have known better not to perform his duties as a simple bureaucrat but to be more vigilant and
intellectual to read and understand material put before him to see whether the
actions against terrorism taken by the Sri Lanka Government and its Armed
Forces have been fairly and justifiable examined before allowing a damning resolution against a country that
had suffered under terrorism for 30 long years,
be presented at the UN Council for Human Rights in Geneva ?
The Darusman
report asserts that 40 000
civilian Tamils had been killed during
the last phase of the military operations against the Terrorists.
This number is vastly
exaggerated. The
USA State
Department used this number of 40,000
Civilans killed by the Sri Lanka Armed Forces
in preparing the resolution to shock
the UN Human Rights Council by
portraying to the Council the Sri
Lanka Armed Force as irresponsible, inhuman,
indisciplined, committing mass rape, and practicing genocide against the Tamils.
The Sri Lanka Armed
Force was on the contrary a a model of an Armed Force, of well disciplined soldiers, human, kindly, not
committing rape, or genocide against the Tamils. That the
Perhaps it would educate the Prince what
The Officers and Soldiers
of the Sri Lanka Armed Forces were aware of their responsibility and aware that
the military operations were not against the innocent Tamils civilians, but against the ruthless terrorists who
terrorised not only the other communities but also the Tamils themselves . The
Tamil Politicians refuse to give credit to the Sri Lanka Armed Forces for that
undivided attention they gave to the Tamil Civilians as much as to the civilian
Sinhala and Muslim people of the country.
The UN High
Commission of Human Rights had a right to question those proposing the
resolution as to how they can justify that number of deaths. There are many who
questioned the 40,000 deaths claimed by the Panellists who wrote the fictitious Darusman report. Lord
Naseby of
Why does not the
excellent Prince Zeid Al-Hussein take a look at what Lord Neseby had to say on
the numbers the false Darusman Fiction had reported ?
If the Prince Zeid
Al-Hussein as representing UN had any good sense he should have taken it on
himself to have advised the foolish half
witted Mangala Samaraweera , the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sri Lanka not
to sponsor the US Resolution Against Sri
Lanka ,which that foolish man did not understand was a resolution
against his own Country.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment