UN stands for United Nations. UNHRC stands for United Nations Human Rights Commission. The Human Rights Commission of the United Nations should not be there to accuse a Nation for violation of human rights, but to defend the Nations against violations of Human Rights by groups that had infiltrated into its territory.
That is to say if human rights of a group or an individual has been violated, the Nation or the Country involved should not be accused for such violations, but reasons for such violations should be investigated and remove the causes that resulted in human rights violations. But condemning the country for such violation should not be the role of the UN. Because the UN stands for all Nations, and the UN is made up of different Nations. Each Nation is independent and has a right not to be interfered into its internal affairs.
The government had to end terrorism before it could start any development projects for the country. Therefore, the Government called upon its defence forces to plan strategies and take steps to end terrorism. The terrorists had with ruse and help from outside recourses grown into a considerable military force. The Government Forces had great difficulty in standing upto the terrorist forces, but sacrificing men and material the Government Forces were able to bring the terrorists under control.
It is only at the point when the terrorists were getting the heat from the government forces that the Foreign elements that had found entry in to
These INGO elements also influenced the foreign media to carry propaganda against the government and in favour of the terrorists. It was at this point that the foreign human rights activists appeared in the scene visiting
Fighting a ruthless terrorist force enriched by a rich diaspora and helped by the foreign NGOs was already a difficult task and to face accusations of violation of human right was uncalled for. The Government Forces were carrying out military operations avoiding death an injury to civil population. But nevertheless, the propaganda in favour of terrorists and against Government forces redoubled with the Tamil diaspora dishing out millions of Dollars, buying up media space, attorneys, journalists, and television , and radio time.
Into this vast antigovernment network fell the UN System. The UN which is to defend its Member Nations against unjustified critics, took sides with the critics to accuses its own Member Nations. UN Charter recognises a Nation’s inherent right to defend itself against its aggressors, enemies and terrorists. The UN System has therefore to stand by the Nations affected by external and internal enemies., to give it moral support and defend it against its accusers.
But what happened is quite the opposite. The UN is accusing its own Member Nation for violation of human rights. The UN has changed its role. Ban Ki Moon of UNO defends the terrorist, Koichiro Matsuura of UNESCO gives Prizes for journalists who discredit Member Nations.
How can the UN system become an enemy of its own Member Nation ? It is the setting up of the UN Human Rights Commission that corrupted the UN Role. In addition to the UNHRC there are the Human Rights watch and the Amnesty International. They are all doing the same job accusing Nations for Violation of Human rights in its duty of defending its territory and protecting its people. They are unable to sort out in what situation a Nation could be accused of violation of human rights. A Nation in its rightful defence of its territory and its people against an “enemey” cannot be accused of violation of human rights !
The mandate to the UNHRC reads, “ The Commission on Human Rights was intended to examine, monitor and publicly report on human rights situations in specific countries or territories (known as country mechanisms or mandates) as well as on major phenomena of human rights violations worldwide (known as thematic mechanisms or mandates).
The mandate speak of human rights situations in specific countries, as well as major phenomena of human rights. This falls outside countries that is fighting terrorism.
Why should therefore the UNHigh Commissioner for Human Rights collect evidence to inculpate
On the other hand All these Countries of the west including the UN System, and Human Rights activists of all sorts stand accused for deliberate interference in to the affairs of