Delegate to the 23 Session of the UNHRCouncil,
Why the Delegates to the 23rd Session of UNHRCouncil should not vote for the USA Resolution against
? Sri Lanka
Because to do that would be counter productive. It is also a travesty of justice. Why should
USA move a resolution against ? In which way would it provide justice to the
Tamil people , and Sri Lanka
as a whole ? Sri Lanka
In finding a solution to the problem of the Tamil people, they cannot be separated from the rest of the people of
. But Sri
Lanka is only pandering to the Tamil Community separating them from the rest of the
communities. Separating people in a
country for what ever cultural, social and religious differences is not promoting human rights, it is an injustice in the highest sense. USA
But this is what
USA had been doing in countries like Yugoslavia
without taking into consideration ’s own historical racial
Honourable Delegates, consider for an instance the Situation where the Black-Americans which is about 12 percent of the American Population demand a separate American States in the south like
Carolina and exclusively for themselves. What would have been the reaction of the Government
of USA ? Florida
taken drastic action against them, with
the Ku Klux Klan burning the Black Americans alive. USA
But instead of that segregation,
America integrated the Black Americans into the
white population building one great nation of . Despite that American
experience why does America America now
seeks to divide communities in countries out side . America should instead be a
unifying force. It should instead of
passing resolutions against America Sri Lanka
advice the Tamil population to integrate with the other Communities in Sri Lanka as it happened in . But America is
doing what is politically beneficial to it. America
What is behind this
USA move to present a resolution against at UNHRC ? Sri Lanka
The real reason is that the expatriate Sri Lanka Tamils living in
Canada and in other European
Countries contributed to finance
the terrorism in . They
collected ( and continue to collect) funds from the Tamils in the diaspora, to purchase arms and ammunition, military
equipment and sophisticated communication material etc.They thus assisted the Tamil
terrorists in Sri Lanka to break away the North and East of Sri Lanka by force
to setup a separate State for the Tamil people.
A repenting terrorist arms procurer Sathajhan Sarachandran serving a 25 year prison term in US says, “ The rejection of armed militancy is a complete reversal for the
Toronto men, who were
part of the international weapons procurement network that supplied the Tamil
Tigers, or LTTE, during ’s long civil war. (National Post) Sri
When the terrorists were eliminated the pro-terrorist Tamils of the diaspora who had collected large sums of money to help terrorism were left with these funds, and decided to continue terrorism through other means for the creation of a
in . Sri Lanka
They formed into Tamil Front Organisations to carry out a well organised campaign against
, discrediting the
Government and accusing the Sri Lanka Armed Forces for violation of human rights and war crimes. They worked along with their
Agents in Sri Lanka Sri Lanka the Tamil
Nationa Aliance, which is a proxy party of the Sri
Lanka terrorists , to prepare the ground to accuse
for violation of human rights and war crimes during the last phase of the
military operations against the terrorists, and eventually set up a separate
State for Tamil people. Sri Lanka
Some of these Tamil Front Organisations in America formed a group called Tamils for Obama, and assisted actively in the President Barak Obama’s Presidential Campaign making financial contributions becoming known political activists amoung the Democratic Party Establishment. They were thus able to contact the officials of the American State Department, and approach the American Political hierarchy to accuse
for violation of human
rights and war crimes against the Tamil
people in the course of the elimination of terrorism. Sri Lanka
They were able through various means to get the
USA and its allies to accuse for
violation of human rights and war crimes at the last phase- which was about two
weeks before the elimination of the
terrorists. But the actual terrorism in Sri Lanka lasted
for thirty years, and the process of elimination of the terrorists by the
intervention of the Sri Lanka Armed Forces commenced only in 2005. Sri Lanka
Why then the investigation for violation of human rights and war crimes only for the last two weeks before the elimination of terrorism ?
This is the question the Delegates should ask themselves.
The reason Sirs, is that the terrorists from 1983 to 2005 carried out a systematic war of terror massacring large numbers of innocent villagers, men women and children in bomb explosions setting claymore bombs in buses , trains, and in market places. They invented suicide bombs that assassinated the Indian Prime Minister, a President of Sri Lanka, Several Government Ministers, Army and Police Officers, and wounded a President of Sri Lanka and the Commander of the Armed Forces. They used pistol gangs to kill many Tamil politicians and intellectuals. They killed the
’s Foreign Minister using
a sniper. Sri Lanka
All these and more massacres, assassinations, ruthless murders and crimes committed by the terrorists are well documented. Compared to this ruthless well documented murderous history of the terrorists, what ever human rights violation, or war crimes that are supposed to have been committed during the military operations of the Sri Lanka Armed Forces during the last two weeks before the elimination of the terrorists are insignificant.
But the selection of this two weeks( the last phase) to accuse the Government of Sri Lanka and the Armed Forces for violation of human rights and war crimes is deliberate as in any war from Hiroshima to Sri Lanka the most confusing period of a war is the last moments of the war as there is utter confusion , and eye witnesses do not survive to tell the tale.
After five years what actually happened at the last phase of the war is over shadowed with falsehood, imaginary stories, prepared evidence like the UK Channel 4 documents, and even stories invented by terrorists themselves who have become ordinary persons washed of their criminal past, like Ananthi Sasitharan the wife of a terrorist Ellalai who recruited children for terrorists forces, and now living safely in Jaffna. Elected as a Provincial Councillor she comes now before the UNHRC wailing about the crimes committed by the Sri Lanka Armed Forces against the Tamil women.
Five years after the elimination of the terrorts, investigating into what happened during the last phase of the war is inappropriate, as all that past is clouded and the resulting search would only be imagined and invented harrowing tales. Therefore, if an investigation is necessary it should be for the past 25 years and not just the last two weeks. An investigation of the past 25 years of terrorism will show proof without any reasonable doubt of their ruthless crimes, and make it evident the necessity of their elimination at whatever cost , and what ever was the out come at the last phase.
In view of all that, what is the necessity of the
resolution against ? Sri Lanka
How is this International Investigation USA is proposing in the Resolution they are presenting help the Tamil people now ?
Is it to satisfy the conscious of those Tamil Expatriate Terrorist Front Organisations in the
Canada, UK, Netherland and else where outside Sri Lanka and their Agents the Tamil National
Alliance in ,
or is there an ulterior motive by the sponsor of the Resolution- USA and its
Allies of the West ? Sri Lanka
It is evident Respected Delegates, that
has taken the initiative to move this Resolution against for
other political reasons of its own, under cover of redressing any discrimination committed against the Tamils people by the Sri Lanka Government
or its Armed Forces. Sri Lanka
The resolution has nothing to do with the elimination of terrorists by the Armed Forces of Sri Lanka. It has more to it than meets the eye.
When USA State Department sent its Ambassador- at- Large Stephen Rapp, the Assistant Secretary for South Asian Affairs Nisha Desai Biswal, or even Navi Pillai, the UN Commissioner of Human Rights ( not forgetting that UN is now an extended arm of the USA State Department) to investigate the situation prior to preparing the damning resolution, they went only to the North of Sri Lanka, and interviewed persons or groups who were known to be anti Government or the known anti Government Tamil News Paper Office Udayan.
But the people in the South of Sri Lanka suffered as much from terrorism, and many former Sinhala and Muslim residents of
who were chased
away by the terrorists now live in the South.
But none of these American or the UNHRC investigators visited the
South, and speak to the people who had directly suffered from terrorism, nor
did the visit the Media offices in the south as they did in the North.
Therefore, these investigations were superficial and carried out to fit into an
already decided plan of action. Jaffna
This means that all these US State Department emissaries were only a cover up as the US State Department all the time knew what the resolution is going to be. The underlying reason for the US Resolution against Sri Lanka is to engage with Sri Lanka, in a more cunning way by sending International Investigators, NGOs, human rights activists and journalists with the right to move about in Sri Lanka unchallenged, have access to anti government media offices and put as many people as they can against the Government.
It would then be possible to create a rebellious situations like those in
Egypt, and putting people against
people, and arm if possible the
rebellious groups allowing the International Community to intervene and eventually force the government to step down.
That is a possible scenario Respected Delegates, these have happened in
Chile, , etc. and continue to happen
elsewhere. Iran has still the CIA with all the know how for
creating appropriate situations to
remove populer Presidents. USA
Are you allowing that to happen in
by voting for the USA
to be presented at the UNHRCouncil
Sessions ? Sri Lanka
If you would go through the resolution and read the demand No. 5 you will note that it is to
Sri Lanka subjugate its
rights of governance , and policy development to and its its Western allies.
This is a very high handed demand the intention of which is to keep USA Sri Lanka dependent and loyal to the Senate of USA,
which demands the control ’s
economic and Security interests. Sri Lanka
Under this resolution
USA may dictate our choice
of the political system of Governance, our economic relations with other
countries such as China,
Russia etc., and even the deployment of armed forces within . Sri Lanka
This obnoxious demand No.5 of the US Resolution reads: (5)calls upon the President to develop a comprehensive policy towards Sri Lanka that reflects United States interests, including respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law, economic interests, and security interests.
Therefore, as a patriot of Sri Lanka- which became Independent from British Colonial Rule in 1948, and which is now an Independent Sovereign State and wishing to protect that Sovereignty of Sri Lanka intact, I request you to please vote against this most undemocratic , cunningly phrased resolution meant to dupe the honourable Delegates, to demand of them their vote to take control of Sri Lanka and do what it pleases with a puppet government put in place.