It is not
that I agree wit his politics, but I vote gainst the extra nationalist Marine
Le Pen from being elected.
Some call
Macron the “ambitious man on the move” , an “ anti-System Candidate”, the “maverick
centrist outsider” and yet others call
him a political Prince.. If elected at 39 he would be the first youngest elected
President in the history of France .
He calls himself a liberal – one who
stands for change or reform not abandoning entirely his Socialist hue. He prides calling
himself a child of Provincial France. He
is supported mainly by the young and the
not so young. He is no receipt holder of membership to any political party. He leads
his own political movement- En March.
Macron
former investment banker with Rothschild & Co., is a stranger to French political system having
served only a short period of
counselling economics to President François Holland,and then as his Minister of Economics for two years.
He is
unconventional in all sense and proved his
willingness to keep his promise against
all odds by marrying his former High School professor 24 years his senior. He
even joked about his gay tendencies, evoking the surprise of his wife Brigitte
as to how he manages it despite her being with him 24 hours of the day.
At the
beginning of his odd man Presidential election
campaign the elder political elite did not pay any attention to him, but
Macron relentlessly worked on to wriggle himself into the political lime light
to give short shivers to serious Presidential candidates to be. His centrist
voice finally won and he had qualified for the second run with more chances
than Marine Le Pen to finally win the Presidential election.
He is not
anti Muslim and does no believe in keeping
closed the European boaders from immigrants. He says anyone should have
the right to practice his religion with dignity. He has no sympathy to low wage
earners and wishes to reduce some of their welfare benefits. He is business
friendly promoting the upper class than the underdog.
I disagree
on his foreign policy which does not
differ from both right and left
governments of the past. He is to increase defence spending , which is
permissible as far as the protection of France is concerned, but not the use
of the military for intervention in foreign lands. There is no need to attack Syria , and the
government of its elected President Bashar Al-Assad.
No
government in the West has the correct politics to suit the present time. Today
there is a mounting surge of violence in
the world expanding to become ruthless
terrorism. Hence the World Governments have to invent strategic politics not to
curb terror by terror, but by finding other means to stop the surge and
dissuade violence taking the form of
terrorism.
None of the
Western Governments are people friendly. They are more for the upper and business
class. It was Francois Mitterand who was the more popular people friendly French President. More
would have been pleased to vote for Jean Luc Mèlnanchon who would
have been another people friendly President after François Mitterand.
In Syria there was
anti government activities by certain groups which was immediately taken over by the Western
countries to promote a regime change in Syria
as they did in Libya , and Sri Lanka as
well in 2015. The Russian Government fortunately intervened to protect the
elected Bashar Al-Assad whose government was really attacked by armed Syrian
terrorists, which interpretation was refused by the USA and the West for whom the other
people’s terrorists are not their terrorists.
That
Russian intervention in Syria
stopped the escalation of war in that country and the other countries around.
It was USA , under George Bush
and Barrack Obama, with his “war monger” Hillary Clinton, which was
out to intervene militarily in foreign countries, to maintain the leadership of USA in the world. France and the
rest of the European countries and Canada joined in with their NATO
forces for this world class military assassination of Nations.
The time is
now ripe for all Nations of the world to start settling issues in dialogue, as
UNO has failed to accomplish this role. USA
has also invented Human Rights as a
means to interfere in to internal affairs of Sovereign States they consider are
lead by political leaders unfriendly
towards the USA
and the West.
The USA intervention in Ukrain was a
mistake that lit the fires of dissention amoung the European countries. It is
essential that European countries join hands with Russia as a partner. instead of carrying on a cold with trade blockades. The
Governments may disagree but that is no reason why people are made to suffer by
imposing trade blockades. Political dissention between countries should be
settled by healthy dialogue.
Emmanuel
Macron if elected should re think about his political stand vis-à-vis Russia , and Bashar Al-Assad. All elected political leaders of all
Sovereign states both those of the developed countries and the developing
countries should respect each other,
that is the clef to a peaceful world where people may share each others happiness
and prosperity.
Emmanuel
Macron should when elected make an effort to revitalise the UN as an instrument for world peace, without allowing
it to follow the rich USA
and the West, to isolate the poor developing nations.
No comments:
Post a Comment