The fact
finding Mission
of Indian Lokh Sabha led by the leader
of the Opposition Sushima Swaraj has gone back. They have gone having
instructed us as to what we should do to separate our Communities, giving more
privileges to one Community not speaking
of the other Communities whose interests with which they were apparently not concerned . What they
were seeking was the situation of
the Tamil Community; rightly so
as they were being observed by the Tamil Nadu political stalwarts.
But In Sri
Lanka one cannot speak only of the Tamil Community without speaking of the
other Communities as they are all interrelated and the interest of one
Community affects the interest of the other Communities. Hence it was
a strange fact finding Mission.
They have
told us how we should implement the 13th
Amendment, and resettle the IDPs. Their instructions, advice and demands are
directed towards the Government of Sri Lanka, without forcing the TNA ,which is
the party that adulates India, while mumbling the “pride of being Sri Lankans”,
to be flexible and make reasonable
demands.
But they
were more respectful towards the
recalcitrant TNA, and have not demanded of them to respect the constitution of
Sri Lanka, not to go round the world accusing the Government of Sri Lanka, talking
through their hats about the aspirations of the Tamil people and demand more
powers for the provinces in the North and East which the other provinces do not demand.
They did
not ask the TNA being Members of the Parliament of Sri Lanka should while
respecting the relevant sections of the Constitution, without transgressing any of the Articles of the Constitution in their speech and
action, should also participate in Parliamentary Committees as loyal citizens
and responsible politicians.
Our media
apparently had no questions to put to the fact finding Mission, though they always vociferous and jump
to criticise the Government of Sri Lanka.
The leader
of the Indian delegation had said that they had come to see the progress Sri Lanka has made since the end of
the armed conflict in May, 2009….. and
to get a sense of the
situation with regard to the way forward
to achieving a lasting and broad based peace in Sri Lanka. But unfortunately India despite its support for the
development of some of the infrastructure activities, had not been a help to
force the very un-Sri Lankan TNA MPs to stop their disruptive activities .
The delegation
could have explained to the TNA MPS that they are standing in the way of the
government which is making the maximum effort to reconcile the Communities and
develop the country having removed terrorism
and brought peace into the country.
It is easy to ask the government to persuade the TNA to join the PSC, but it is TNA working hand in hand with Rudrakumaran and his anti Sri L anka groups like Prabhakaran the terrorist leader, which does not want to participate in any Government project that would damage their interest to form a Tamil Ealam State in the North and East with police and land power, nominally being within a United Sri Lanka but having their own provincial government where the Government will not be able to intervene in case they run the Provincial Council independent of government authority.
It is easy to ask the government to persuade the TNA to join the PSC, but it is TNA working hand in hand with Rudrakumaran and his anti Sri L anka groups like Prabhakaran the terrorist leader, which does not want to participate in any Government project that would damage their interest to form a Tamil Ealam State in the North and East with police and land power, nominally being within a United Sri Lanka but having their own provincial government where the Government will not be able to intervene in case they run the Provincial Council independent of government authority.
That would
not be in the interest of Sri Lanka and doing so would be helping the TNA even
to recommence terrorist activities in the provinces under their “jurisdiction”,
not forgetting that the initial group of terrorists was trained in India.
Sushma Swaraj says, “ We have noted the improved situation regarding the resettlement of IDPs. However, a significant number of them continue to be in transit situations or with host families. Our task will not be complete until they return to their original homes. Similarly, while there has been substantial progress in the area of rehabilitation and reconstruction, a lot remains to be done. We are prepared to assist in whatever way possible, in a spirit of partnership and cooperation.”
Sushma Swaraj says, “ We have noted the improved situation regarding the resettlement of IDPs. However, a significant number of them continue to be in transit situations or with host families. Our task will not be complete until they return to their original homes. Similarly, while there has been substantial progress in the area of rehabilitation and reconstruction, a lot remains to be done. We are prepared to assist in whatever way possible, in a spirit of partnership and cooperation.”
Sri Lanka has already
managed with nearly 300 000 IDPs and the majority of them have been
settled to their satisfaction, what remains is only a fraction of what we had
dealt with single handedly without the assistance and the support of
India.
The few thousands that remain would also be settled down when demining is
completed without the assistance of India whose bona fides is now being
questioned.
Ms.Swaraj ,
had as every one else, spoken about the LLRC and the importance of implementing
the recommendations urgently. Don’t we the Sri Lankans know the urgency of
implementation of the recommendations of the LLRC which had been appointed by
our President ?
It is not
the Americans or the Indians that have to tell us when and how we should
implement the recommendation of the LLRC. It is not really their d..n business. No body told us how to eliminate terrorism, we did it our way even though the terrorist friendly Robert
O Blake told us ad nauseam that there is no military solution to terrorism but
a political solution.
Then the Indian delegation spoke of matters that do not concern them such as the “……. reduction of high security zones, return of private lands by the military and demilitarization, including phasing out of the involvement of the security forces in civilian activities and restoration of civilian administration in the Northern Province. We have noted the assurance given by the Government of Sri Lanka in Parliament that it will ensure the withdrawal of security forces from community life and confine their role to security matters.”
Then the Indian delegation spoke of matters that do not concern them such as the “……. reduction of high security zones, return of private lands by the military and demilitarization, including phasing out of the involvement of the security forces in civilian activities and restoration of civilian administration in the Northern Province. We have noted the assurance given by the Government of Sri Lanka in Parliament that it will ensure the withdrawal of security forces from community life and confine their role to security matters.”
It has to
be reiterated, again and again, that our armed forces are special, different from the Armed Forces of
India , or any Western country. It is
our soldiers that fought against terrorism, some of them giving their lives and limbs to bring peace
to Sri Lanka. They are of our people and by their brave
intervention in a “war “ against the terrorist have become a vital part of our
country. They are not the type of
soldiers that could be confined to Military Camps. They have to be deployed every where whether
one likes it or not for the security of
the people and the protection of their
motherland.
They-the
soldiers should be seen by every one, every day and appreciated for the role
they played to bring peace to Sri
Lanka.
They are now in a no-war situation and apart from the necessity to keep vigilance over some parties like that of
the TNA, which may re introduce
terrorist elements, the soldiers should also be employed in other civil
activities beneficial to themselves, to the people and the country. In America after their wars in Vietnam etc. their soldiers became a danger to
American society, some of them being psychologically affected by the gruesome
wars. We cannot see that happening to
our Soldiers who are our heroes
Therefore
entrusting our soldiers with security or civil activity is no business of India or any other country. They need not tell us how to deploy the
persons of our Armed Forces.
The Leader
of the delegation had said that the Tamil people complained that the Army
interfered into their daily life.
Unfortunately the Sri Lanka Army is there to stay and the Tamil people have to get used to the presence
of Soldiers, which is both in their interest
and in the interest of the country.
For thirty
years they had got used to living in
fear of the terrorists who unlike the Sri Lankan Soldiers came to take away
their children and make demands of their support at gun point. Therefore complaining about the presence of Soldiers is not in absurd.
Is it not
better to live with Soldiers who are protective without being aggressive, or is it better to live in fear
again with another spate of terrorism which is likely, if there is no proper
security ?
It is
better miss the “arthadhama pooja” at midnight and do it at a clean place at
home, rather than risk their lives to a terrorist rump who may perpetrate an
act of terror.
Meaningful
devolution of power taking into account Tamil peoples’ equality, dignity,
justice and self-respect , could easily be served by Tamil people integrating
in to the main stream of Sri Lankan Nation hood, without being a special
Communal group of Tamils trying to
remain outside the main Nation Body of Sri Lanka.
That is
some thing the Indian Delegation should have emphasised to Sampanthan of
TNA. But obviously the Indian Delegation
was trying to fortify the Tamils in Sri Lanka as a separate entity to
woo the Tamil Nadu politicians.
The 13th
Amendment is obsolete and it is now a hindrance
for Sri Lanka
to go forward. It is being utilised by India who authored it, and
Sampanthan and the TNA as an obstacle of reconciliation. It should be withdrawn from the constitution
and caste aside to clear the way forward.
It is wrong for the Indian Delegation to have harped on that as it is a
purely Indian innovation which does not fit into Sri Lankan way of thinking.
The Unity
of the Communities should be built on understanding, mutual respect and
confidence in each other rather on a piece of legislation that had been imposed
on us. Therefore , we should speak
neither of 13A or 13A plus in speaking of post-terrorist Sri Lanka.
It all
depends on the Tamil people of Sri
Lanka, whether they want to be an integral
part of the larger Sri Lankan Nation or remain outside as a separate
entity. If it is the latter then they
cannot fall back on a 13A if it has been removed. Then the necessity would make the Tamils
perhaps give up their Communal difference to be one with the rest of the
Communities.
Then Sushima Swaraj goes on to say, “…...
These projects gave us some satisfaction that India's assistance, especially in
the areas of humanitarian assistance, temporary shelter, housing, de-mining,
education and vocational training, public health, connectivity, and revival of
agriculture and other livelihood activities, has been able to make a difference
to the lives of the people….”
India should get rid of its “ TamilNadu
fear” and come forward to help Sri Lanka
as a nation and not as Sri Lanka a patch work of
Communities.
It is true
the brunt of the suffering from terrorism had been the lot of the Tamil people
in the North and East, but since after
elimination of Sri Lanka we are building a nation it has to be taken into account
that even those of the South lived in
constant fear of death and massacre and
could not organise their lives properly.
Therefore India
should not keep on harping on the Tamil Communal ticket but get involved in the
process of reconciliation and building peace and harmony every where in Sri Lanka.
Lastly Ms.Swaraj Says, “….. India and Sri Lanka are bound by ties of history, geography and culture. Our partnership must therefore progress in the spirit of being the closest of neighbours and friends whose destinies are intertwined…….”
Lastly Ms.Swaraj Says, “….. India and Sri Lanka are bound by ties of history, geography and culture. Our partnership must therefore progress in the spirit of being the closest of neighbours and friends whose destinies are intertwined…….”
But that
does not mean that India
should “some time” revert to back stabbing, in order to satisfy the Tamil Nadu
politicians who are driven politically through sentiments, hatred and desire
for revenge rather than through wisdom and intellectual maturity.
The Tamil
Nadu politicians should be more diplomatic in their relation with Sri Lanka ,
developing astute political relations which could, if they desire so help the
Tamil people in Sri Lanka, without trying to separate them from their
legitimate right of being a part of the Sri Lankan Nation to which they have a
better claim than to be the “pets” of
the TamilNadu because of their Tamilness.
If the
Tamils of Sri Lanka were to be in Tamil Nadu , they will suffer social
degradation through Caste system, where as in Sri Lanka they are equal citizens
among the Sinhala and Muslim compatriots without any discrimination caste or
racial.